LlU5b 


—  s 

1§ 


^KJf. 


A. 


it 


V 


^, 


s^   % 


^ 


>- 


'^smy 


#    % 


^ 


%]l% 

do 

> 

;Vjjv 

% 

^ 

-< 

-"ur:i?*:..3!TY  OF  CAl.lFORNlAs 

LOS  ANGELES,  CALf'f^. 

LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 


SELECT  LIST 
OF  REFERENCES  ON 


BOYCOTTS  AND  INJUNCTIONS 

IN  LABOR  DISPUTES 


COMPILED  UNDER  THE  DIRECTION  OF 

HERMANN  HENRY  BERNARD  MEYER 

CHIEF    BIBLIOGRAPHER 


WASHINGTON 

GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  0FFIC3E 

1911 


llZH2i 


p 


PREFATORY    NOTE 

The  list  here  presented  was  originally  intended  to  indicate  litera- 
ture on  the  use  and  abuse  of  injunctions  in  labor  disputes,  but  the 
subject  was  found  to  be  so  interwoven  with  the  boycott  that  the  scope 
of  the  list  was  extended  to  include  that  question  also. 

The  injunction  proved  to  be  so  powerful  a  weapon  in  labor  dis- 
putes and  its  abuse  under  certain  circumstances  so  easy,  that,  almost 
from  the  start,  it  aroused  the  greatest  interest  and  has  been  widely 
discussed  in  popular  magazines,  and  the  publications  of  labor  organ- 
izations. These  two  classes  of  publications  consequently  have 
furnished  a  large  part  of  the  references;  and  special  pains  have  been 
taken  to  present,  as  completely  as  possible,  those  writings  in  which 
labor  leaders  have  expressed  their  attitude  toward  the  question. 
The  other  main  source  of  information  has  proved  to  be  the  legal 
literature  of  the  past  twenty  years;  this  has  been  freely  drawn  upon, 
though  without  citation  of  particular  cases.  To  have  included  such 
would  have  been  to  duplicate  work  already  well  done  in  the  "American 
digest."  Those,  therefore,  who  desire  references  to  particular  cases 
should  consult  that  work,  which  extends  down  to  1896,  and  its  sup- 
plements the  "Decennial  edition  of  the  American  digest,"  1897-1906, 
and  the  "American  digest  annotated"  which  extends  from  1906  to 
1910.  Complete  bibliographical  descriptions  of  these  works  with 
special  page  references  are  given  on  page  4  of  this  list. 

Certain  cases  have  aroused  so  much  interest  that  they  have  been 
widely  discussed  outside  of  the  legal  profession.  References  to 
these  discussions  have  been  included  and  they  will  be  found  brought 
together  under  appropriate  headings  in  the  index  at  the  end  of  the 
list. 

Two  new  features  have  been  introduced  into  this  list  which  will 
prove  of  special  interest  to  librarians.  When  jn-inted  catalogue  cards 
exist  for  any  work  entered  in  the  list,  the  Library  of  Congress  card 
number  is  printed  immediately  after  the  entry  at  the  left.  On  the 
same  line  to  the  right  the  class  mark,  where  determined  in  the  new 
classification,  is  printed  in  heavier  type. 

II.   H.  B.  Mkver 
Chief  BihUogmpher 

Herbert  Putnam 

Librarian  of  Congress 

Washington,  D.  C,  March  23,  1911 

ni 


SELECT   LIST   OF   REFERENCES  OX    BOYCOTTS  AND  INJUNC- 
TIONS IN  LABOR  DISPUTES 

Adams,  Thomas  S.     Strikes  and  boycotts. 

(In  Adams,  Thomas  S.,  and  Helen  L.  Sumner.    Labor  problems,  pp. 

175-212.     New  York,  1905.     8°.) 

References:  pp.  212-213. 

HD8072.A25 

Allen,  Charles  Clafiin.     Injunction  and  organized  labor.     A  paper 
read  at  the  seventeenth  annual  meeting  of  the  American 
bar  association  held  at  Saratoga,  August  22,  1894. 
[n.  p.,  1894?] 

36  pp.     8°. 

Reprinted  from  the  Transactions  of  the  Association,  v.  17,  pp.  299- 

331. 
Published  also  in  American  law  review,  Nov.-Dec,  1894,  v.  28,  pp. 

828-859;  in  Albany  law  journal,  Sept.  1,  1894,  v.  50,  pp.  140-151; 

in  Western  law  times,  Aug.-Nov.,  1894,  v.  5,  pp.  81-92,  103-110, 

119-135;  in  American  lawyer,  v.   2,  p.  434,  and  in  Ohio  legal 

news,  V.  1,  p.  513. 
8-11232  HD7819.U5A7 

American  academy  of  political  and  social  science,  Philadelphia. 
A(hiiinist ration  of  justice  in  the  I'nited  States. 
Philadelphia:  American  academy  of  political  and  social 
science,  1910.  v,  (2),  3-253  pp.  4°.  {The  annals  of  the 
American  academy  of  political  and  social  science,  vol. 
xxxvi,  no.  1.) 

The  scope  and  limits  of  the  injunction,  pp.  85-141.     Contents.— 
Introductory  address,  by  C.  P.  Neill;  Use  and  abuse  of  injunc- 
tions in  trade  disputes,  by  J.  H.  Ralston,  ('.  E.  Littlcfield,  J.  A. 
Emery,  and  A.  Furuseth. 
10-15614  Hl.A4,v.36         HV7405.A6 

American  and  English  decisions  in  equity.     Bcin-:  select  cases 
dccickul  in  the  appclhite  courls  of  America  and  England. 
With  notes.     Annual.     First  series. 
Philadelphia:   M.  Murphy,  lS9r)-1905.     W  vols.     8°. 

No  more  published. 

Contents  relating  to  injunctions  and  boycotts  in  labor  cases: 
Vol.   2  (189G),   pp.  3G4-414.     Injunction— strikes— iulerstale  com- 
merce—obstruction of  the  mails— contempt .     In  n-  Debs,  peti- 
tioner.    (Supreme  court  of  the  United   States.     May  27,   1895: 
158  U.  S.,  564;  15  Sup.  ct.  rep.,  900.) 

3 


4  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

American  and  English  decisions  in  equity — Continued. 

\\)1.  3  (1897),  pp.  5o0-546.  Injunction  —  criminal  acts  —  labor 
unions — conspiracy  to  injure  business.  Vegelahn  v.  Guntner 
et  al.  (Supreme  judicial  court  of  Massachusetts.  Oct.  27,  1896; 
44N.E.  rep.,  1077.) 

Vol.  7  (1901),  pp.  557-566.  Flaccus  v.  Smith  et  al.  (Supreme  court 
of  Pennsylvania.  Apr.  15,  1901;  199  Pa.,  128;  48  Atl.  rep.,  894. 
Affirming  30  Pitts.  L.  J.,  N.  S.  (Pa.),  129.) 

Vol.  7  (1901),  pp.  567-599.  Injunction — trades  unions — conspiracy 
to  deprive  non-union  workmen  of  employment.  Plant  et  al.  v. 
Woods  et  al.  (Supreme  judicial  court  of  Massachusetts.  Sept. 
6,  1900;  176  Mass.,  492;  57  N.  E.  rep.,  1011.) 

Vol.  9  (1903),  pp.  285-288.  Injunctions  against  libelous  publica- 
tions in  reference  to  strikes,  boycotts,  and  other  labor  matters. 

Vol.  10  (1905),  pp.  548-576.  Injunction — interference  with  employ- 
ment— labor  unions — rival  organizations — compelling  discharge  of 
employ^ — constitutional  rights.  Erdman  v.  Mitchell.  (Supreme 
court  of  Pennsylvania.  Oct.  12,  1903;  207  Pa.,  79;  56  Atl.  rep., 
327.     Affirming  10  D.  R.,  701.) 

American  digest ;  a  complete  digest  of  all  reported  American  cases 
from  the  earliest  times  to  1896.     [Century  ed.] 
St.  Paul:    West  publishing  co.,  1897-1904.     50  vols.     4°.   [ 

"Conspiracy" :  v.  10,  col.  1095-1200.  See  sect.  10,  relating  to  boycotts. 
"Injunction":  v.  27,  col.  1415-2391.     See  sect.  174 (Boycotts, strikes 

and  other  combinations);  175  (Interference  with  employes);  177 

(Criminal  conspiracies  and  combinations). 
See  also  under  heading  Monopolies. 
Nov.  9,  98-1* 

—     Decennial  edition  of  the  American  digest ;  a  complete  digest 

of  all  reported  cases  from  1897  to  1906.     vol.  1-19. 
St.  Paul:  West  publishing  CO.,  1908-10.    19  vols.    4°-    (Amer- 
ican digest  system.) 

"Injunction":  v.  10,  pp.  1765-2044.     See  sect.  101  (Boycotts  and 

other  combinations),  pp.  1881-1889. 
See  also  under  heading  Monopolies. 
8-17767 

AmLerican  digest  annotated;  key-number  series,  vol.  1-8.  Con- 
tinuing without  omission  or  dupUcation  the  Century 
edition  of  the  American  digest,  1658  to  1896,  and  the 
Decennial  edition,  1897  to  1906.  A  digest  of  all  current 
decisions  of  all  the  American  courts,  as  reported  in  the 
National  reporter  system,  the  official  reports,  and  else- 
where, from  Oct.  1,  1906,  to  Mar.  31,  1910.  Prepared  and 
ed.  by  the  editorial  staff  of  the  American  digest  system. 
St.  Paul,  Minn.:  West  publishing  co.,  1907-10.  8  vols.  4°. 
See  entries  under  Conspiracy  and  Injunction. 


BOYCOTTS  AND   INJUNCTIONS  5 

American  federation  of  labor.  Supreme  court  of  the  United 
States.  October  term,  1910.  No.  190.  The  Buck's 
stove  &  range  company,  vs.  the  American  federation  of 
labor,  et  al.,  appellee.  No.  372  (or  old  no.  685).  Samuel 
Gompers,  John  Mitchell  and  Frank  Morrison,  petitioners, 
vs.  the  Buck's  stove  &  range  company,  respondent.  Brief 
in  reply  to  appellant's  brief  in  no.  372  (or  okl  no.  685). 
New  Yorl:  William  R.  Ficke  co.,  [1910].     35  pp.     8°. 

Cover-title. 

Ralston,  Siddons  &  Richardson,  solicitors  for  appellees  in  no.  190; 
for  appellants  in  no.  394;  for  petitioners  in  no.  372  (or  old  no.  685). 
Alton  B.  Parker,  Jackson  H.  Ralston,  F.  L.  Siddons,  W.  E.  Rich- 
ardson, John  T.  Walker,  of  counsel. 

In  the  Supreme  court  of  the  United  States.     October  term, 

1910.  No.  190.  The  Buck's  stove  &  range  company, 
appellant,  vs.  the  American  federation  of  labor  et  al., 
appellees.  No.  394.  The  American  federation  of  labor 
et  al.,  appellants,  vs.  the  Buck's  stove  &  range  company, 
appellee.  Brief  on  behalf  of  the  American  federation  of 
labor  et  al.,  appellees  in  no.  190  and  appellants  in  no.  394. 
[  Washington,  D.  C:  Judd  cfc  Detweiler,  inc.,  printers, 
1910.]  54  pp.  8°. 
Cover-title. 

Jackson  H.  Ralston,  Frederick  L.  Siddons,  William  E.  Richardson, 
appellants'  solicitors.  Alton  B.  Parker,  John  T.  Walker,  of 
counsel. 

Supreme  court  of  the  United  States.     October  term,  1910. 

No.  190.  The  Buck's  stove  &  range  company,  appellant, 
vs.  the  American  federation  of  labor,  et  al.,  appellee.  No. 
394.  The  American  federation  of  labor,  et  al.,  appellants, 
vs.  the  Buck's  stove  &  range  company,  appellee.  No.  372. 
Samuel  Gompers,  John  Mitchell  and  Frank  Morrison, 
petitioners,  vs.  the  Buck's  stove  &  range  company, 
respondent.  Brief  for  appellants  in  no.  394  and  for 
petitioner  in  no.  372. 
New  Yorl:  William  R.  FicJce  co.,  [1910].     171  pp.     8°, 

Cover-title. 

Old  no.  685  changed  to  no.  372  on  cover. 

Ralston,  Siddons  &  Richardson,  solicitors  for  appellees  in  no.  190; 

for  appellants  in  no.  394;  for  petitioners  in  no.  685.     Alton  B. 

Parker,  Jackson  H.  Ralston,  F.  L.  Siddons,  W.  E.  Richardson, 

John  T.  Walker,  of  counsel. 

Buck's  stove  and  range  company  injunction  suit  and  con- 
tempt proceedings. 
Washington,    D.    C:  [American  federation   of  labor],  1910. 
37,  (1)  pp.     8°. 

Bibliography:  p.  13. 

10-6187  HD7819.U5A7 


6  LIBRAKY   OF   CONGRESS 

American  federation  of  labor.  Memorial  of  international  and 
national  trade  and  labor  unions,  remonstrating  against 
the  inaction  of  Congress  in  the  matter  of  legislation  in  the 
interest  of  organized  labor  and  urging  the  necessity  for  im- 
mediate action  for  relief  from  the  results  to  come  from 
the  literal  enforcement  of  the  Sherman  antitrust  law. 

[  Washington,  Government  printing  office,  1908.]  8  pp.  8°. 
{60th  Congress,  1st  session.     Senate  doc.  4OO.)  5265 

Signed  by  the  officers  of  the  American  federation  of  labor  and  of 

numerous  other  labor  organizations. 
Reprinted  in  American  federationist,  Apr.,  1908,  v.  15,  pp.  261-266. 
8-35313  HD8072.A5 

Report  of  proceedings  of  the  annual  convention,  1881-date. 

Cincinnati  [etc.],  1882-date. 

The  reports  since  1893  include  much  material  bearing  on  the  ques- 
tions of  boycotts  and  injunctions. 
8-23471t  HD8055.A5A3 

Beach,  Charles  Fisk.     Commentaries  on  the  law  of  injunctions  as 
determined  by  the  courts  and  statutes  of  England  and  the 
United  States. 
Albany:  H.  B.  Parsons,  1895.     2  vols.     8°. 

"Relating  to  strikes,  boycotts  and  monopolies":  v.  1,  pp.  505-528. 

Bell,  Richard.     Trade  unionism. 

London  and  Edinburgh:  T.  C.  &  E.  C.  JacJc,  1907.  U),  108 
pp.  12°.  {The  social  problems  series,  ed.  by  Oliphant 
Smeaton,  [no.  iii].) 

Includes  a  history  of  the  "Taff-Vale  case." 

8-34738  HD6664.B4 

Benton,  Josiah  Henry,  jr.     What  is  ''government  by  injunction?" 

Does   it   exist   in   the  United   States?     Annual   address 

before  the  Grafton  and  Coos  bar  association,  January  28, 

1898. 

Concord,  N.  H.:  The  Rumford  press,  1898.     110  pp.     8°. 

8-11233  HD7819.TJ5B3 

Bishop,  James,  jr.     Government  by  injunction. 

{In  Georgia  bar  association.     Report  of  the  nineteenth  annual  ses- 
sion, July  3-5,  1902,  pp.  283-288.     Atlanta,  1902.     8°.) 

Bolen,  George  Lewis.     Getting  a  living;  the  problem  of.  wealth  and 
poverty — of  profits,  wages  and  trade  unionism. 
New   Yorlc,  London:  The   Macmillan  company,  1903.     xii, 
769  pp.     8°. 

"The  injunction  in  labor  disputes":  pp.  548-580. 

3-28542  HD8072.B62 


BOYCOTTS   AND   INJUNCTIONS  7 

Bryan,  James  Wallace.     The  development  of  the  English  law  of 
conspiracy. 
Baltimore:   The  Johns  Hoplcins  press,  1909.     161  pp.     8°. 
(Johns  Hoplcins  university  studies  in  historical  and  political 

science.     Series  xxvii,  nos.  3-Jf.-5.) 

"Abbreviations  for  authorities  cited":  pp.  159-161. 

" Combinations  of  labor  " :  pp.  115-158. 

9-11161  H31.J6,ser.27 

Bryan,  William  Jennings.     Speeches,  revised  and  arranged  by  liim- 
self.     With  a  biographical  introduction  b}^  ^lary  Baird 
Bryan,  his  ^\^fe. 
New  YorTc  and  London:  Funk  cfc    }Yagnalls  company,  1909. 
2  vols.      Frontispieces  {portraits).     16°. 

Speech  discussing  injunctions,  delivered  in  Chicago,  Sept.  7,  1908: 

V.  2,  pp.  164-180. 
9-30038 

Buck's  stove  and  range  company,  St.  Louis,  Mo.  In  the  Supreme 
court  of  the  United  States.  October  term,  1910.  Xo. 
190.  The  Buck's  stove  and  range  company,  appellant, 
vs.  American  federation  of  labor,  appellees.  No.  394. 
American  federation  of  labor,  et  al.,  appellants,  vs.  the 
Buck's  stove  and  range  company,  appellee.  Brief  for 
the  Buck's  stove  and  range  company. 
Washington,  D.  C:  Press  of  B.  S.  Adams,  [1910].    96  pp.    8°. 

Cover-title. 

Daniel  Davenport,  J.  J.  Darlington,  solicitors. 

In  the  Supreme  court  of  the  United  States.     October  term, 

1910.     No.  372.     Samuel  Gompers,  John  Mitchell,   and 
Frank  Morrison,   petitioners,   vs.   Buck's  stove   &   range 
company,  respondent.     Brief  for  respondent. 
Washington,  D.  C:  Press  ofB.  S.  Adams,  [1910].    74  pp.    8°. 

Cover-title. 

Dani(4  Davenport,  J.  J.  Darlington,  attorneys. 

In  the  Supreme  court  of  the  United  States.     October  term, 

1910.  190.  The  Buck's  stove  &  range  company,  appel- 
lant, vs.  the  American  federation  of  labor,  et  al.,  appellees. 
372.  Samuel  Gompers,  John  Mitchell,  and  Frank  Morri- 
son, petitioners,  vs.  the  Buck's  stove  &  range  company, 
respondent.  394.  The  American  federation  of  labor,  et 
al.,  appellants,  vs.  the  Buck's  stove  &  range  company, 
appellee.  Supplemental  and  reply  brief  for  appellant  in 
no.  190,  reKi)()ii(lcnt  in  no.  372,  and  appellee  in  no.  394. 
Washington,  I).  C:  Press  ofB.  S.  Adams,  [1910].    25  pp.    8°. 

Cover-tillo. 

Daniel  Davenport,  J.J.  Darlington,  .solicitors. 


8  LIBRABY   OF    CONGRESS 

Buck's  stove  and  range  company.  In  the  Supreme  court  of  the 
District  of  CoUimbia.  Tlie  Buck's  stove  &  range  co. 
plaintiff  vs.  the  American  federation  of  labor,  et  al. 
defendants.  In  equity,  no.  27,305.  Copies  of  pleadings, 
preliminary  injunction  order,  opinion  of  Justice  Gould, 
and  testimony  on  hearing  for  permanent  injunction. 
J.  J.  Darlington,  solicitor  for  plaintiff.  James  M.  Beck, 
Daniel  Davenport,  of  counsel. 
[  Washington,  1908.]     ii,  862  pp.     8°. 

Cover-title. 

8-25859 

■ Transcript  of  record.     Supreme  court  of  the  United  States, 

October  term,  1910.  No.  190.  The  Buck's  stove  & 
range  company,  appellant,  vs.  the  American  federation 
of  labor,  Samuel  Gompers,  Frank  Morrison,  et  al.  Filed 
April  10,  1909.  No.  394.  The  American  federation  of 
labor,  Samuel  Gompers,  Frank  Morrison,  et  al.,  appel- 
lants, vs.  the  Buck's  stove  &  range  company.  Filed 
December  30,  1909.  Appeals  from  the  Court  of  appeals 
of  the  District  of  Columbia.  (21,593  and  21,946.) 
[Washington,  D.  C:  Judd  cfc  Detweiler,  (inc.),  printers,  1909.] 
{2),  vi,  677  pp.     8°. 

Cover-title. 

Title  read  originally:  October  term,  1909.     No.  414  ...  no.  720. 

Record  of  proceedings  in  the  Supreme  court  and  Court  of  appeals  of 
the  District  of  Columbia.  The  opinion  of  the  court  in  the  appeal 
case  (pp.  635-667)  will  be  found  also  in  "Reports  of  cases  adjudged 
in  the  Court  of  appeals  of  the  District  of  Columbia,"  v.  33  (1910), 
pp.  83-132. 

Transcript  of  record.     Supreme  court  of  the  United  States. 

October  term,  1910.  No.  372.  Samuel  Gompers,  John 
Mitchell,  and  Frank  Morrison,  petitioners,  vs.  the  Buck's 
stove  &  range  company.  On  writ  of  certiorari  to  the 
Court  of  appeals  of  the  District  of  Columbia.  Petition 
for  certiorari  filed  November  27,  1909.  Certiorari  and 
return  filed  February  18,  1910.  (21,911). 
[Washington,  D.  C:  Judd  &  Detweiler,  (inc.),  printers, 
1910.]    Hi,  687  pp.     8°. 

Cover-title. 

Title  read  originally:  October  term,  1909.     No.  685. 
Record  of  proceedings  in  the  Supreme  court  and  Court  of  appeals  of 
the  District  of  Columbia. 

Burns,  W.  F.     The  Pullman  boycott.     A  complete  history  of  the 
great  R.  R.  strike. 
St.   Paul:  The    McGill  printing  co.,   1894.     ^h   '^-318  pp. 
Frontispiece  (portrait).     12°. 

7-29955.t  HD5325.R12.1894.C53 


BOYCOTTS  AND   INJUNCTIONS  9 

Garland,  John  E.     "Government  by  injunction." 

{In  South  Dakota  bar  association.  Report  of  the  proceedings  of  the 
meeting  held  for  the  purpose  of  organizing  the  association,  Dec.  7, 
1897,  pp.  23-31.     Sioux  Falls,  [1897?].     8°.) 

Charnock,  Singleton,     Injunctions  in  labor  disputes  and  the  rem- 
edy. 
Reno:  Nevada  press  co.,  [1910].     20  pp.     Portrait.     8°. 

10-11555  HD7819.U6C6 

Clark,  John  Bates.     Essentials  of  economic  theory  as  apphed  to 
modern  problems  of  industry  and  public  pohcy. 
New   Yorlc:  The   Macmillan  company,  1907.     xiv,  (2),  566 
pp.     Diagrams.     8°. 

"Boycotts  and  the  limitiBg  of  products":  pp.  503-516. 

7-36896  HB171.C57 

Clayton,  Henry  D.     The  President  and  injunctions.     Speech  in  the 
House  of  Representatives,  May  30,  1908. 

(In  Congressional  record,  60th  Congress,  1st  session,  v.  42,  pt.  8, 
Appendix,  pp.  573-587.     Washington,  1908.    4°.) 

Jll.R5,v.42,pt.8 

Cogley,  Thomas  Sydenham.     The  law  of  strikes,  lockouts  and  labor 
organizations. 
Washington,  D.  C:  W.  H.  Lowdermilk  cfc  co.,  1894.     xiv,  (2), 
377  pp.     8°. 

Reviewed  in  American  law  review,  July-Aug.,   1894,  v.  28,  pp. 

629-638. 
"Strikes   as   conspiracies — boycotts,    picketing,  blacklisting":  pp. 

247-295;  "Civil  remedies — inequity:  by  injunction" :  pp.  342-346. 
2-20181  HD5317.TJ4C7 

Cohen,  Hermann  Joseph,  and  George  Howell.     Trade  union  law 
and  cases,  a  text  book  relating  to  ti'ade  unions  and  to 
labour. 
London:  Sweet  &    Maxwell,  limited;  [etc.,  etc.],  1901.     xiii, 
a-d,  250  pp.     12°. 

"The  conspiracy  and  protection  of  property  act,  1875  " :  pp.  123-171. 
3-1928  HD6495.G8C7 

Trade  union  law.     2d  ed. 

London:  Sweet  d-  Maxwell,  limited,  1907.     xiv,  198  pp.     12°. 

"Table  of  cases":  pp.  vii-xiv. 

7-26448  HD6496.G8C68 


10  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

Commons,  John  Rogers,  ed.     Trade  unionism  and  labor  problems. 
Boston,  New    York  [etc.]:  Ginn   ct   company,  ['^WOo].     (4), 
iii-xiv,  628  pp.     8°.     (Selections  and  documents  in  eco- 
nomics, ed.  by  W.  Z.  Ripley.) 

Reprinted  from  various  reports  and  periodicals. 

"Derisions  of  courts  in  labor  disputes":  pp.  156-194.  I.  Injunc- 
tions and  trial  by  jury:  pp.  15G-163;  JI.  Picketing:  pp.  163-169; 
III.  Boycott — Irreparable  damage:  pp.  170-177;  IV.  Boycott — 
Free  speech:  pp.  178-181;  V.  Blacklist:  pp.  181-183;  VI.  Em- 
ployment of  nonunionists:  pp.  183-194. 

5-34201  HD6483.C7 

V  Cooke,  Frederick  Hale.     The  law  of  trade  and  labor  combinations 
as    applicable    to    boycotts,   strikes,   trade    conspiracies, 
monopolies,  pools,  trusts,  and  kindred  topics, 
Chicago:  CallagJian  c&  co.,  1898.     xxv,  214  1>V'     8°. 
Nov.  23,  98-39 

The  law  of    combinations,  monopolies  and  labor   unions. 

2d  ed. 
Chicago:  Callaghan  and  company,  1909.     Ixix,  466  pp.     8°. 
"The  present  treatise  is  based  upon,  rather  than  a  new  edition  of 
'The  law  of  trade  and  labor  combinations,'  published  in  1898." — 
Pref. 
9-25995 

Crosby,  Oscar  T.     Strikes:  when  to  strike,  how  to  strike.     A  book 
of  suggestion  for  the  buyers  and  sellers  of  labour. 
New  York  and  London:  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1910.     vi,  (2), 
202  pp.     12°.     (Questions  of  the  day.) 
"The  boycott  and  the  picket " :  pp.  152-173. 
10-12323  HD5306.C8 

Darlington,  Joseph  James.  Buck's  stove  &  range  co.,  plaintiff,  vs. 
the  American  federation  of  labor  et  al.,  defendants. 
Arguments  in  support  of  petition  to  have  Samuel  Gom- 
pers,  Frank  Morrison  and  John  Mitchell,  defendants, 
adjudged  guilty  of  contempt.  W.  C.  Sullivan,  Daniel 
Davenport,  J.  J.  Darlington,  James  M.  Beck,  sohcitors 
for  plaintiff. 
New  York  city:  American  anti-boycott  association,  [1910]. 
68  pp.     8°. 

Cover-title. 

Contains  the  opening  argument  of  J.  J.  Darlington  and  closing  argu- 
ment of  James  M.  Beck  in  part  only. 

"In  the  Supreme  court  of  the  District  of  Columbia,  no.  27,305 
equity." 

10-7505  HD7819.U5Da 


BOYCOTTS   AND   INJUNCTIONS  H 

Dunbar,  William  II.     Government  by  injunction. 

New  York:  Pub.  for  the  American  economic  association  by 
tJie  Macmillan  company;  London,  S.  Sonnenschein  &  co., 
1898.  43  pj).  8°.  {American  economic  association. 
Economic  studies,     v.  3,  no.  1.) 

Originally  published  in  the  Law  quarterly  review  (London),  for  Octo- 
ber, 1897,  V.  13,  pp.  347-367. 
4-415  HBl.A55,v.3        JF721.D8 

Eaves,  Lucile.     A  history  of  California  labor  legislation,   with  an 
introductory  sketch  of  the  San  Francisco  labor  movement. 
Berkeley:   The    University  press,   [1910].     xiv,  4^1  pp.     4°- 
(  University  of  California  publications  in  ecoTwmics,  v.  2.) 

Bibliography:  pp.  444-448. 

"Judicial  restraint  of  the  action  of  trade-unions:"  pp.  394-438. 

10-21328  H31.C2,v.2         HD7835.C2E2 

Eddy,  Arthur  Jerome.     The  law  of  combinations  embracing  monopo- 
lies, trusts,  and  combinations  of  labor  and  capital;  con- 
spiracy, and  contracts  in  restraint  of  trade. 
Chicago:  Callaghan  &  co.,  1901.     2  vols.     8°. 
"Injunction":  v.  2,  pp.  1151-1219. 
Feb.  7,  1901-26 

Edwards,  Alba  M.     The  labor  legislation  of  Connecticut. 

[New  York:  Puh.  for  the  American  economic  association  by 
the  Macmillan  company;  etc.,  etc.,  1907].  viii,  322  pp. 
8°.  {Publications  of  the  American  economic  association. 
Third  series,  v.  8,  no.  3.) 

"Boycotting  and  blacklisting":  pp.  135-169. 

7-30620  HBl.A5,3dser.,  V.8        HD7835.C8E2 

Ely,  Richard  Theodore.     The  labor  movement  in  America.     New 
ed.,  rev.  and  enl. 
New   York,  London:  The   Macmillan  company,  1905.     {8), 
[v]-xvi,  {2),  399  pp.     12°.     {The  citizen's  library  of  eco- 
nomics, politics,  and  sociology.) 
The  boycott:  pp.  296-303. 
5-20422  HD8072.E6 

Fisher,  S.  B.     Strikes  and  boycotts. 

{In  McKinney,  William  M.,  comp.     Encyclopaedia  of  pleading  and 

practice,  v.  20,  pp.  981-985.      Northport,  N.  Y.,  1901.     4°.) 
See  also  supplemental  articles  in  Supplement  to  the  Encyclopedia 

of  pleading  and  practice,  v.  3  (1905),  p.  931;  and  v.  4  (1909),  p. 

1368. 


12  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

Frey,  Erich  Max.     Strike  und  Strafrecht. 

Heidelberg:     C.     Winter's     Universitdtshuchhandlung ,    1906. 

Inaug.-diss. — Heidelberg. 

"Literatur":  pp.  108-114. 

"Schwarze  Listen — Sperre — Boykott":  pp.  90-97. 

6-46063  HD5317.G3F8 

George,  Henry,  ;/>.     The  menace  of  privilege ;  a  study  of  the  dangers 
to  the  repubhc  from  the  existence  of  a  favored  class. 
New    YorJc,  London:  The    Macmillan  company,  1905.     xii, 

"Use  of  the  coxirts  by  privilege":  pp.  175-185;  "Government  by 

injunction":  pp.  186-200. 
5-37149  HN64.G3 

Ghent,  William  James.     Our  benevolent  feudalism.. 

New   Yorlc:  The   Macmillan  company;  London:   Macmillan 
&  CO.,  ltd.,  1902.     vii,  202  pp.     12°. 

"Our  interpreters  of  law":  pp.  102-121. 

2-26876  HN64.G415 

Gompers,  Samuel.     Injunction  data  filed  by  Samuel  Gompers. 

Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1908.     211pp.     8°. 
8-35537  HD7819.G63 

Meaning  of  the  word  "conspiracy",  etc.     Paper  relative 

to  amendments  to  the  bill  to  limit  the  meaning  of  the  word 
"conspiracy"  and  the  use  of  ''restraining  orders  and  in- 
junctions" in  certain  cases.     March  21,  1902. 
[Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1902.]     3  pp.     8°. 
{57th  Congress,  1st  session.     Senate  doc.  no.  266.)       4235 

Great  Britain.  Royal  commission  on  trade  disputes  and  trade  com- 
binations. Report  of  the  Royal  commission  on  trade 
disputes  and  trade  combinations  [with  Minutes  of  evi- 
dence, together  with  index  and  appendices]. 
London:  Printed  for  H.  M.  Stationery  office,  by  Wyman  & 
sons,  limited,  1906.  2  vols,  in  1.  F°.  {Parliament. 
Papers  by  command.     Cd.  2825-2826.) 

Report  signed:  Dunedin,  Arthur  Cohen,  Sidney  Webb.     Hartley 

B.  N.  Mothersole,  secretary. 
Branches  of  the  subjects  treated:  a.  The  liability  of  trade  union 
funds  to  be  taken  in  execution  for  the  wrongful  acts  of  agents  of 
the  union,  b.  The  statute  law  relating  to  picketing  and  other 
incidents  of  strikes,  c.  The  law  of  conspiracy  as  affecting  trade 
unions. 
6-14815  HD661.B4 


BOYCOTTS  AND   INJUNCTIONS  13 

Groat,  George  Gorham.  Trade  unions  and  the  law  in  New  York;  a 
study  of  some  legal  phases  of  labor  organizations. 
New  York:  The  Columbia  university  press,  the  Macmillan 
company,  agents;  [etc.,  etc.],  1905.  134  VV-  ^°-  (Studies 
in  history,  economics  and  public  law,  ed.  by  the  Faculty  of 
political  science  of  Columbia  university,  vol.  xix,  no.  3.) 

5-21578  H31.C7,v.l9         HD6495.U5N55 

Hackney,  Thomas.  [Revision  and  codification  of  the  penal  laws  of 
the  United  States — Criminal  conspiracy — Shall  it  be  a 
crime  to  strike?  Speech,  in  the  House  of  Representa- 
tives, January  11,  1908]. 

{In  Congressional  record,  60th  Congress,  let  session,    v.  42,  pt.  1, 
pp.  612-613.     Washington,  1908.     4°.) 

Jll.R5,v.42,pt.  1 

Hallett,  Allen  P.     Labor  combinations. 

(In  American  and  English  encyclopaedia  of  law,  2d  ed.,  v.  18,  pp. 

80-94.     Northport,  N.  Y.,  1901.     4°.) 
"Boycott":  p.  87;  "Injunctions  against  unlawful  acts":  pp.  91-93. 

Heckel,  Max  von.     Boykott. 

(In   Handworterbuch    der   Staatswissenschaften,    1.     Supplement- 
band,  pp.  252-257.     Jena,  1895.     4°.) 
"Litteratur":  p.  257.  H45.H19,sup.,  v.  1 

Henry,  Robert  Lee.  Injunctions  by  federal  courts.  Speech  in  the 
House  of  Representatives,  May  26,  1908. 

(In  Congressional  record,  60th  Congress,  1st  session,  v.  42,  pt.  8, 
Appendix,  pp.  245-254.    Washington,  1908.    4°.) 

Jll.R5,v.42,pt.8 

■'■High,  James  Lambert.     A  treatise  on  the  law  of  injunctions.     4th 
ed.,  rev.  and  greatly  enl.,  by  Shirley  T.  High. 
Chicago:  Callaghan  and  company,  1905.     2  vols.     S°. 

"Of  injunctions  against  strikes  and  boycotts":  v.  2,  pp.  1409-1423. 
5-39527 

Howell,  George.  A  handy-book  of  the  labour  laws:  being  a  popular 
guide  to  the  Employers  and  workmen  act,  1875;  Con- 
spiracy and  protection  of  property  act,  1875;  Trade  union 
acts,  1871,  1876,  and  1893  ...  etc.,  etc.  With  introduc- 
tions, notes,  and  the  authorised  rules  and  forms  for  the 
use  of  workmen.  3d  ed.  rev. 
London  and  New  YorJc:   Macmillan  and  co.,  1S95.     xii,  338 

pp.     12°. 

9_627  HD6495.G8H8 


14  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

Howell,  George.     Labour  legislation,  labour  movements,  and  labour 
leaders.     2d  etl. 
London:  T.    F.    TJnwin,   1905.     2  vols.     Frontispiece    (por- 
trait).    8°. 

Legal  position  of  trade  unions,  etc.:  v.  2,  pp.  478^91. 

5-10469  HD8388.H77 

Huebner,  Grover  Gerhard.  Blacklisting.  Prepared  with  the  co-op- 
eration of  the  Political  science  department  of  the  Uni- 
versity of  Wisconsin. 
Madison,  Wis.:  Wisconsin  Jree  library  commission,  Legis- 
lative reference  department,  1906.  22  pp.  12°.  {Wis- 
consin Jree  library  commission.  Legislative  rejerence  depart- 
ment.    Comparative  legislation  bulletin  no.  10.) 

"References":  p.  3. 

7-12494  HD5466.H88 

Boycotting.     Prepared  with  the  cooperation  of  the  PoHtical 

science  department  of  the  University  of  Wisconsin. 
Madison,    Wis.:    Wisconsin  free  library  commission.  Legis- 
lative reference  department,  1906.   26  pp.    12°.    ( W^isconsin 
free  library  commission.    Legislative  reference  department. 
Comparative  legislation  bulletin  no.  9.) 
"References":  pp.  3-4. 
7-10303  HD5461.H88 

Hughes,  WiUiam.     Speech  in  the  House  of  Representatives,  March 
14,  1908. 

{In  Congressional  record,  60th  Congress,  1st  session,  Mar.  14,  1908, 
V.  42,  pt.  4,  pp.  3349-3352.     Washington,  1908.     4°.) 

Jll.R5,v.42,pt.4 

Appended  are  the  preamble  and  resolutions  of  the  special  committee 
on  injunctions  reported  to  the  nineteenth  annual  convention  of 
the  United  mine  workers  of  America. 

*Hunter,  Wiles  Robert.     The  crisis:  the  unions  and  the  courts,  the 
tyranny  of  injunctions,  the  power  of  unity. 
Chicago:  S.  A.  Block,  1909.     32  pp.     16°. 

Injunction. 

{In  New  international  encyclopaedia,  v.  10,  pp.  630-631.  New 
York,  1909.     4°.)  AE6.N55,v.  10 

Jevons,  Thomas  Seton.     The  law  of  trade  unions;  being  a  text  book 
concerning  trade  unions  and  labour. 
London:  E.  Wilson,  1907.     vii,  lU  PP-     i^°- 

"Table  of  cases":  pp.  v-vii. 

7^2085  HD6496.G8J5 

*Not  in  the  Library  of  Congress. 


BOYCOTTS  AND  INJUNCTIONS  15 

Jewett,  John  N.     The  writ  of  injunction  as  a  governmental  agency. 
{In  Illinois  state  bar  association.     Proceedings  at  the  twenty-sixth 

annual  meeting,  July  17-18,  1902,  pp.  43-76.     Springfield,  1902. 

8°.) 
Reprinted  in  American  lawyer,  May-June.  1903,  v.  11,  pp.  197-200, 

247-251. 

Joyce,  Howard  C.     A  treatise  on  the  law  relating  to  injunctions. 

Albany,  N.  Y.:   M.  Bender  &  company,  1909.     3  vols.     8°. 

"Chapter  xvii.     Relating  to  strikes,   boycotts,  and  monopolies": 

V.  ],  pp.  758-801. 
9-9297 

Judson,   Frederick  Newton.     The  labor  decisions  of  Judge  Taft. 
Reprinted  from  the  Review  of  re^news,  for  August,  1907. 
Columbus,  0.,  [1907].     16  pp.     8°. 

8-1470  HD7834.J9 

Kerr,  William  Williamson.     A  treatise  on  the  law  and  practice  of 
injunctions.     4th  ed.     By  Edgar  Percy  Hewitt,  assisted 
by  Sydney  E.Williams  and  John  Melvin  Paterson. 
London:  Sweet  and  Maxwell,  limited,  1903.     xlviii,  656  pp, 

"Nuisances  connected  with  trade  disputes":  pp.  241-244. 
4-32027 

[Knaus,  Henry.]     Judicial  usurpation.     An  open  letter  to  Congress 
showing  tliis  in  the  injunctions  in  labor  disputes. 
Chicago,  <^1908.     {16)  pp.     8°. 

8-9022  HD7819.I75K6 

Lawyers'  reports  annotated.     Digest  of  the  Lawyers  rci)()rts  anno- 
tated, volumes  1-70  (cited  "L.  R.  A.");  with  full  index 
to  annotation. 
Rochester,  N.  Y.:  The  Lawyers  co-operative  publishing  com- 
pany, 1907.     3  vols.     8°. ' 

See  entries  under  Conspiracy,  Injunction,  etc. 
7-13008 

Digest  of  the  Lawyers  reports  annotated,  New  series,  vol- 
umes 1-24.     Cited  "L.  R.  A.  (N.  S.)"     With  full  index 
to  annotation,  vols.  1-24. 
Rochester,  N.  Y.:  The  Lawyers  co-operative  publishinij  com- 
pany, 1910.     U),  1818  pp.     8°. 

See  entries  under  Conspiracy,  Injunction,  Labor  organizations,  etc. 
7-23620 
67382°— 11 2 


16  LIBRAEY   OF   CONGRESS 

Leavitt,  John  Brooks.     Injunctions. 

(In  Bliss,  William  D.  P.,  ed.     New  encyclopedia  of  social  reform; 
new  ed.,  pp.  624-627.     New  York,  1908.     4°.)  H41.B62 

Trusts  and  labor  unions  from   a  legal    aspect.     Rights  of 

property  and  rights  of  men. 

(In  Peters,  John  P.,  cd.     Labor  and  capital,  pp.   110-118.     New 
York,  1902.     12°.)  HD8072.P386 

Liechti,  Eugen.     Die  Verrufserklarungen  im  modernen  Erwerbsle- 
ben,  speciell  Boykott  und  Arbeitersperre. 
Zurich:  Art.  Institut  0.  Fussli,  1897.     149,  (1)  fp.     8°. 

Inaug.-diss. — Zurich. 

"Verzeichnis  der  Speciallitteratur " :  1  page  at  end. 

l-G-2766  HD5461.L5 

Littlefield,  Charles  E.     Injunctions.     Speech  in  the  House  of  Repre- 
sentatives, May  30,  1908. 

{In  Congressional  record,  61st  Congress,  Ist  session,  v.  42,  pt.  8^ 
Appendix,  pp.  512-564.     Washington,  1908.     4°.) 

Jll.R5,v.42,pt.8 

Lloyd,  Henry  Demarest.     Men,  the  workers. 

New  York:  DouUeday,  Page  cfc  company,  1909.     viii,  280  pp. 
Frontispiece  (portrait).     8°. 

"Strikes  and  injunctions":  pp.  156-171. 

9-35791  HD8072.L65 

Low,  Alfred  Maurice.     The  British   conspiracy  and   protection   of 
property  act  and  its  operation. 

(In  United  States.     Bureau  of  labor.     Bulletin,  v.  6,  no.  33,  pp. 
305-322.     Washington,  1901.     8°.)  HD8051.A5,v.6 

Reprinted  in  Senate  document  no.  190,  57th  Congress,  1st  session, 
pp.  87-104. 

MacDonald,  James  Ramsay.     The  law  and  trade  union  funds.     A 
pleafor ''ante-Taff  Vale." 
London:   Independent  labour  party;   [etc.,  etc.,  1903].     16  pp. 
8°. 

7_37202  HD6495.G8M2 

Mantoux,  Paul,  and  Maurice  Alfassa.     La  crise  du  trade-union- 
isme. 
Paris:  A.  Rousseau,  1903.     (4),  338  pp.     8°.     (Bihliotheque 

du  Musee  social.) 

"L'affaire  du  'Taff  Vale  railway'.     Situation  juridique  et  histoire 

judiciaire  des  trade-unions":  pp.  5-84. 
" T6moignages  et  documents  " :  pp.  263-327. 
3-27130  HD6664.M2 


BOYCOTTS   AND   IXJUXCTIONS  17 

Martin,  William  Alexander,  and  S.  B.  Fisher.     Injunctions. 

{In  American  and  English  encyclopaedia  of  law,  2d  ed.,  v.  16,  pp. 
337-470.     Northport,  N.  Y.,  1900.     4°.) 

See  also  supplemental  article  by  E.  C.  EUsbree  in  Supplement  to 
the  American  and  English  encyclopaedia  of  law  (2d  ed.),  v.  3 
(1906),  pp.  580-603;  and  article  in  v.  5  (1908),  pp.  930-940. 

A  treatise  on  the  law  of  labor  unions,  containing  a  consider- 

ation of  the  law  relating  to  trade  disputes  in  all  its  phases, 
internal  administration  of  unions,  union  labels,  and  a  col- 
lection of  approved  forms  of  pleadings,  injunctions  and 
restraining  orders. 
Washington,  D.  C:  J.  Byrne  cC-  co.,  1910.     xxv,  649  pp.     8°. 

"Table  of  cases":  pp.  578-595. 

For  sections  on  boycott,  injunctions,  etc.,  see  index. 

10-13174  _,  HD6495.U4M3 

Massachusetts.     Bureau  of  statistics.     I>abor  injunctions  in  Massa- 
chusetts. 
Boston:   Wright  and  Potter  printing  company,  state  printers, 
1909.     168  pp.     8°.     (Its  Labor  bulletin,  vol.  14,  no.  9; 
whole  no.  70.) 

Cover-title. 

Contents. — Prefatory  note;  General  introduction;  The  court  of 
equity:  its  origin  and  jurisdiction;  The  law  relative  to  labor  dis- 
putes; Typical  cases  and  forms  of  injunctions;  Cases  relating  to 
labor  disputes  in  Massachusetts,  1898-1908;  Cases  of  contempt  of 
court;  Subject  index;  Table  of  cases;  Appendix. 

HC107.M4A3,v.l4 

Bureau  of  statistics  of  labor.      Injunctions   against  strikes 

and  boycotts. 

{In  its  Labor  bulletin,  Sept.,  1906,  no.  43,  pp.  358-363.  Boston, 
1906.     8°.)  HC107.M4A3,no.43 

Recent     British     legislation     affecting     workmen... 

Forming  part  ii  of  the  Annual  report  for  1907  of  the  Bu- 
reau of  statistics  of  labor. 
Boston:  Wright    dc   Potter  printing  co.,  state  printers,  1907. 
49-250  pp.     8°. 

Cover-title. 

Embracing  the  Report  of  the  British  commission  on  trade  disputes 
and  combinations;  Chronological  survey  of  legislation  affecting 
the  legal  status  of  trade  unions  (1824-1900)  and  text  of  principal 
acts  (including  the  Trade  disjjutes  act  of  1906,  in  effect  July  1, 
1907);  The  Workmens  compensation  act  of  1906  (in  effect  July  ], 
1907). 

7-37949  HD7875.M3 


18  LIBRAE!'   OF   CONGRESS 

Merritt,  Walter  Gordon.     The  neglected  side  of    trade-umonism. 
The  boycott. 
[Danhury,  Conn.:  Danlury  medical  'printing  co.,  1902.]     (13) 
pp.     5°. 

CA  7-6873  HD5461.M3 

Milburn,  B.  A.     Injunctions. 

{In  Encyclopaedia  of  pleading  and  practice,  v.  10,  jjp.  869-1129. 

Northport,  N.  Y.,  1898.     4°.) 
See  also  supplementary  articles  in  Supplement  to  the  Encyclopaedia 

of  pleading  and  practice,  v.  2  (1904),  pp.  707-738;    v.  4  (1909), 

pp.  798-812. 

Mitchell,  John.     Organized  labor,  its  problems,  purposes  and  ideals, 
and  the  present  and  future  of  American  wage  earners. 
Philadelphia,  Pa.:  American  hook  and  Bihle  house,  [1903], 
xii,  436  pp.     Frontispiece.     Plates.     Portraits.     8°. 

3-27926/4  HD6503.M6 

Moses,  Jacob  M.     The  law  apphcable  to  strikes.     Prize  thesis,  1895, 
University  of  ^laryland. 
Baltimore:  Printed  hy  King  bros.,  1895.     (6),  [5]-62  pp.     8°. 
"Boycotts":  pp.  18-20;  "Injunction":  pp.  31-53. 
2-19703  HD5317.TJ4M7 

Murphy,  Walter.     The  use  of  the  writ  of  injunction  to  prevent 
strikes. 

{In  Territorial  bar  association  of  Utah.     Report  of  the  first  annual 
meeting,  June  4,  1894,  pp.  30-54.     Salt  Lake  City,  1894.     8°.) 

The  new  international  year  book;  a  compendium  of  the  world's 
progress  for  the  years  1907-1909.     Editor,  Frank  Moore 
Colby. 
New   York:    Dodd,    Mead  and  company,  1908-10.     3  vols. 
Plates.     Portraits.     Maps.     4°- 

See  articles  on  Boycotts  and  Injunctions  in  volumes  for  1908  and  1909. 
8-19149  AE5.I64 

Nicholls,  Thomas  David.     [Injunctions  in  labor  disputes.     Remarks 
in  the  House  of  Representatives,  Apr.  18,  1908.1 

{In  Congressional  record,  60th  Congress,  1st  session,  v.  42,  pt.  5,  pp. 
4918-4919.     Washington,  1908.     4°.) 

Jll.R5,v.42,pt.5 

Parker,  Alton  Brooks,  ed.      Labor  unions. 

{In  Mack,  William,  ed.     Cyclopedia  of  law  and  procedure,  v.  24, 

pp.  815-839.     New  York,  1907.     4°.) 
"  This  article  as  submitted  to  Mr.  Parker  for  editing  was  prepared 

by  Peter  B.  McKenzie  and  John  Warren  Edgerton." 
"Injunctions  against  [labor  unions]":  pp.  830-839. 


BOYCOTTS  AND  INJUNCTIONS  19 

Pearson,  Paul  Martin,  ed.  Intercollegiate  debates;  being  briefs 
and  reports  of  many  intercollegiate  debates:  Ilarvard- 
Yale-Princeton,  Brown-Dartmouth-Williams,  Michiiran- 
Northwestern-Chicago,  Indiana-Illinois-Ohio,  and  many 
others. 
New  York  city:  Hinds,  Nolle  c&  Eldredge,  [1909].  {2),xxix, 
(2),  507  pp.     12°. 

"References"  at  end  of  each  chapter. 

"Injunction  and  the  federal  courts":  pp.  129-137. 

10-765  H35.P4 

Public  policy,  Chicago.     Labor,  capital  and  the  public;  a  discussion 
of    the  relations  between  employes,  employers  and    the 
public. 
Chicago:  Public  policy  publishing  co.,  1905.     viii,  220,   (2) 
pp.     12°. 

"Boycott  against  employer  perpetually  enjoined.  Decision  by 
Judge  John  Hunt  of  the  Superior  court  of  San  Francisco":  pp. 
119-138. 

6-9674  HD8072.P95 

v/Ralston,  Jackson  H.     Use  and  abuse  of  injunctions  in  trade  disputes. 

Philadelphia:   American    academy  of   political    and   social 

science,    [1910].     89-103    pp.     4°.     (Publications  of   the 

American  academy  of  political  and  social  science,  no.  597.) 

Reprinted  from  Annals  of  the  American  academy  of  political  and 

social  science,  July,  1910,  v.  36,  no.  1. 

HD7819.U5R3 

vRay,   Charles  A.     Contractual  limitations,   including  trade  strikes 
and  conspiracies  and  corporate  trusts  and  combinations. 
Rochester,  N.  Y.:  The  Lawyers'  co-operative  publishing  co., 
1892.     liv,  514  pp.     8°. 

"Present  condition  of  the  law  concerning  trade  or  labor  combina- 
tions, "picketing,"  "boycotting":  pp.  406-411. 

Regulation  of  injunctions.     Debate  in  the  Senate  of  the  United 
States,  April  17,  1908.  > 

{In  Congressional  record,  60th  Congress,  1st  session,  Apr.  17,  1908, 
V.  42,  pt.  5,  pp.  4846-4859.     Washington,  1908.     4°.) 

Jll.R5,v.42,pt.6 
Ripley,  William  Z.     Strikes  and  boycotts. 

{In  Harvard  university.  A  guide  to  reading  in  social  ethics  and 
allied  subjects,  pp.  186-187.     Cambridge,  Miuss.,  1910.     8°.) 

Z7164.S66H3 

Rogers,  Henry  Wade,  ed.     Injunctions. 

{In  Mack,  William,  ed.     Cyclopedia  of  law  and  ]>r()(('dun',  v.  22, 

pp.  724-1062.     New  York,  1906.     4°.) 
"This  article  as  submitted  to  Mr.  Rogers  for  editing  was  prepared  by 

Arthur  Linton  Corbin  and  John  Warren  Edgerton." 


20  LIBRAE!'   OF   CONGRESS 

Rogers,  W.  P.     Government  by  injunction. 

{In  State  bar  association  of  Indiana.  Report  of  the  second  annual 
meeting,  held  at  Indianapolis,  June  29,  1898,  pp.  103-116.  Indi- 
anapolis, 1898.     8°.) 

Roosevelt,  Theodore,     The  Roosevelt  pohcy;  speeches,  letters  and 
state  papers,   relating  to  corporate  wealth  and  closely 
alhed  topics;  with  introduction  by  Andrew  Carnegie. 
New  York:  The  Current  literature  publishing  company,  1908. 
2  vols.     Frontispieces  (portraits).     Facsimiles.     12°. 

"Injunctions  in  labor  disputes"  (from  the  President's  message  at 
the  opening  of  the  first  session  of  the  Fifty-ninth  Congress,  Dec. 
5,  1905):  V.  1,  pp.  340-341;  "Use  of  injunctions  in  labor  cases" 
(from  message  of  Dec.  3,  1906):  v.  2,  pp.  444-449;  "Abuse  of 
injunctions  in  labor  disputes"  (from  message  of  Dec.  3,  1907): 
V.  2,  pp.  676-678;  "The  writ  of  injunction  in  labor  cases"  (from 
message  of  Jan.  31,  1908):  v.  2,  pp.  703-705;  "Injunctions  in 
labor  disputes"  (from  message  of  Mar.  25,  1908):  v.  2,  pp.  738-739. 

8-17977  HC106.R78 

Sartorius  von  Waltershausen,  Johann  Georg  August,  freiherr. 
Die  nordamerikanischen  Gewerkschaften  unter  dem  Ein- 
fluss  der  fortschreitenden  Productionstechnik. 
Berlin:  H.  Bahr,  1886.     xv,  352  pp.     8°. 
' '  Boycotten  " :   pp.  237-262. 
"Literatur  iiber  die  nordamerikanischen  gewerblichen   Arbeiter- 

verhaltnisse  " :  pp.  341-344. 
7-1805  HD8072.S27 

V  Schaflfner,  Margaret  Anna.     Effect  of  the  recent  boycott  decisions. 

Philadelphia:  The  American  academy  of  political  and  social 

science,    [1910].     [23]-33   pp.     8°.     {Publications  of  the 

American  academy  of  political  and  social  science,  no.  599.) 

Cover-title. 

Reprinted  from  the  Annals  of  the  American  academy  of  political 

and  social  science,  Sept.,  1910. 
10-20335  HD7819.TJ5S4 

^       Shartel,  John  W.     So-called  government  by  injunction. 

{In  Oklahoma  bar  association.     Proceedings  at  its  annual  meeting, 

Jan.  9-10,  1902,  pp.  54-64.     Guthrie,  1902.     8°.) 
Discussion:  pp.  64-68. 
Reprinted  in  American  lawyer,  Jan.,  1903,  v.  11,  pp.  5-7. 

Sherwood,  Isaac  R.  Against  increasing  the  salaries  of  federal 
judges.  Speech  in  the  House  of  Representatives,  Jan- 
uary 25,  1911. 

{In  Congressional  record,  Jan.  30,  1911,  61st  Congress,  3d  session,  v. 

46,  no.  39  (current  file):  1690-1692.     Washington,  1911.     4°.) 
Chiefly  a  criticism  of  the  use  of  injunctions  by  the  federal  judiciary 
in  labor  cases.    Advocates  popular  election  of  judges. 


BOYCOTTS  AND  INJUNCTIONS  21 

Simpson,  John.     Labor  combinations. 

[In  American  and  English  encyclopaedia  of  law.     2d  ed.     Supple- 
ment, V.  3,  pp.  916-919.     Northport,  N.  Y.,  1906.     4°.) 
See  also  supplementary  article  in  v.  5  (1908),  pp.  1085-1086. 

Smith,  Charles  Manley.  A  treatise  on  the  law  of  master  and  servant, 
including  therein  masters  and  workmen  in  every  descrip- 
tion of  trade  and  occupation ;  with  an  appendix  of  statutes. 
The  6th  ed.  By  Ernest  ]\Ianley  Smith.  With  notes  on 
the  Canadian  law,  by  A.  C.  Forster  Boulton. 
London:  Sweet  &  Maxwell,  limited;  Toronto:  The  CarsweU 
CO.,  ltd.,  1906.     xcvi,  823  pp.     J^°. 

"Combinations  amongst  masters  and  workmen":  pp.  451^58. 
6-23064 

Social  reform  club,  New  York.     Injunctions  in  labor  disputes.     A 
report  read  May  22,  1900. 

{In  United  States.  57th  Congress,  1st  session,  1901-1902.  Senate. 
A  compilation  of  documents  relating  to  injunctions  in  conspiracy 
cases,  pp.  105-112.     Washington,  1902.     8°.)  4234 

Spelling,  Thomas  Carl.     Argument  on  Pearre  anti-injunction  bill 

before  the  Judiciary  committee  of  the  House  of  Kepre- 

sentatives,  February  5,  1908. 

[  Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1908.]     13  pp.     8°. 

(60th  Congress,  1st  session.     Senate  doc.  no.  525.)         6266 

CA  8-3518  HD7819.XJ5S8 

A  treatise  on  injunctions  and  other  extraordinary  remedies, 

y  covering    habeas    corpus,    mandamus,    prohibition,    quo 

warranto,  and  certiorari  or  review;  containing  an  exposi- 
tion of  principles  governing  these  several  forms  of  relief, 
and  their  practical  use;  with  citations  of  all  the  authorities 
to  date.     2d  ed.,  rev.  and  enl. 
Boston:  Little,  Brown,  and  co.,  1901.    2  vols.     8°. 

"Boycotting":  v.  1,  pp.  780-781. 
1-25600— M  3 

A    treatise    on    trusts     and     monopolies,    containing     an 

exposition  of  the  rule  of  public  policy  against  contracts 
and  combinations  in  restraint  of  trade,  and  a  review  of 
cases,  ancient  and  modern. 
Boston:  Little,  Brown,  and  company,  1893.     xxvii,   274  PP- 
8°. 

"'Boycotting' illegal":  pp.  106-109. 

10-11418  HD2761.S72 


22  LIBRAEY   OF   CONGRESS 

Stimson,  Frederic  Jesup.     Handbook  to  the  labor  law  of  the  United 

States. 
New   York:  C.  Scribner's  sons,  1896.      (4),  [vii]-xxii,   (2), 
385  pp.     12°. 

"Strikes  and  boycotts"':  pp.  194-309;  "Equity  process  and  injunc- 
tions— the  anti-trust  law,  and  the  interstate  commerce  law  ":  pp. 
310-347. 

2-19690  HD7834.S8 

Labor  in  its  relations  to  law;  four  lectures  delivered  at  the 

Plymouth  school  of  ethics,  July  1895. 
New  York:  C.  Scribner's  sons,  1895.     (6),  1^5  pp.     16°. 
"Strikes  and  boycotts":  pp.  78-117. 
2-19691  HD7809.S8 

Swan,   Charles  Herbert.     Quelques  decisions  recentes  de  la  Cour 

supreme  des  Etats-Unis  en  matiere  de  travail. 

Bruxelles:  Offi.ce  de  la  Revue,  [1909].     23  pp.     8°. 

"Extrait  de  la  Revue  &onomique  internationale,  novembre,  1909." 
"L'affaire  de  boycottage  en  matifere  de  commerce  entre  les  4tats": 

pp.  14-18. 
10-2949  HD7834.S85 

Taft,   William  Howard.     Answers  of  Secretary  Taft  to  questions 
addressed  to  him  by  the  audience  at  the  conclusion  of 
his    address   on    "Labor   and   capital"    before   Cooper's 
institute,  New  York  city,  Friday,  January  10,  1908. 
Columbus,  0.,  [1908].     8  pp.     8°. 

8-11457  HD8072.T22 

Hon.  William  H.  Taft  discusses  issuance  of  injunctions  in 

labor  disputes,  his  position  clearly  defined  in  correspond- 
ence with  President  Llewelyn  Lewis  of  the  Ohio  federa- 
tion of  labor. 
Columbus,  0.,  [1908].     4  pp.     8°. 

8-11459  HD7819.U5T2 

Labor  and  capital,  their  common  interest,  their  necessary- 

controversies,  their  lawful  acts,  and  the  legal  remedies 
for  their  abuses;  address  before  Cooper's  institute.  New 
York  city,  Friday,  January  10th,  1908. 
Columhus,  0.,  [1908].     16  pp.     8°. 

8-11458  HD8072.T2 


BOYCOTTS  AND  INJUNCTIONS  23 

Taft,    William   Howard.      Political  issues  and  outlooks;  speeches 
delivered  between  August,  1908,  and  February,  1909. 
New  Yorl\-  Douhleday,  Page  c£-  company,  1909.      vi,  299  pp. 
Frontispiece  {portrait).     8°. 

"Labor  and  the  writ  of  injunction;  Topeka,  Kansas,  Oct.  3,  1908": 
pp.  161-165;  "Mr.  Gompers,  the  courts  and  labor;  New  York, 
Oct.  28,  1908"  :  pp.  203-224. 

9-28960  E756.T12 

Present  day  problems;   a  collection  of  addresses  deliverod 

on  various  occasions. 
New  Yorlc:  Dodd,   Mead  cfc  company,  1908.     (6),  355  j>p. 
Frontispiece  {portrait).     12°. 

Labor  and  capital;  New  York  city,  Jan.  10,  1908:  pp.  241-272; 
Recent  criticism  of  the  federal  judiciary;  delivered  before  the 
American  bar  association,  Detroit,  Aug.  28,  1895:  pp.  290-332. 

8-19618  JK246.T2 

Presidential   addresses   and    state    papers,   from   March  4, 

1909,  to  March  4,  1910.     Vol.  1. 
New  York:  Douhleday,  Page  cfc  company,  1910.     xii,  612  pp. 
12°. 

Judicial  decisions  as  an  issue  in  politics;  reprinted  from  McClure's 
magazine  for  June,  1909:  pp.  142-163;  Labor  and  the  writ  of 
injunction;  Chicago,  Sept.  16,  1909:  pp.  191-200. 

10-23512  E761.T12 

Recent  criticism  of  the  federal  judiciary. 

(In  American  bar  association.  Report  of  the  eighteenth  annual 
meeting,  Detroit,  Aug.  27-30,  1895,  pp.  237-273.  Philadelphia, 
1895.     8°.) 

Reprinted  in  American  law  register,  Sept.,  1895,  v.  33,  pp.  576-610; 
in  National  corporation  reporter,  Sept.  26-Oct.  17,  1895,  v.  11, 
pp.  86-87,  107-111,  135-137,  159-161,  and,  in  part,  in  Railway 
review,  Nov.  16,  1895,  v.  35,  pp.  636-637. 

Thomas,  Robert  Young,  jr.     Canal  Zone  at  Panama.     Speech   in 
the  House  of  Representatives,  Jan.  5,  1910. 

{In  Congressional  record,  61st  Congress,  2d  session,  v.  45,  Appendix, 

pp.  3-4.     Washington,  1910.     4°.) 
Introducing  an  amendment  to  the  bill  (If.  R.  12316)  for  the  govern- 
ment of  the  Canal  Zone,  providing  for  jury  trial  in  contempt  cases. 

J 11  .US  ,v.46 , appendix 


24  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

Tiedeman,  Christopher  Gustavus.     A  treatise  on  state  and  federal 
control  of  persons  and  property  in  the  United  States 
considered  from  both  a  civil  and  criminal  standpoint. 
St.  Louis:  The  F.  H.   Thomas  law  hooTc  co.,  1900.     2  vols. 
8°. 

"Strikes  and  boycotts":  v.  1,  pp.  432-465. 
Dec.  6,  1900-64 

United  States.  Bureau  of  labor.  Decisions  of  courts  and  laws 
relating  to  strikes,  combinations,  conspiracies,  boycotts, 
etc. 

tin  its  Sixteenth  annual  report,  1901,  pp.  871-1036.     Washington, 
1901.     8°.)  HD8051.A3     16th 

Labor  laws  of  the  United  States  with  decisions  of 


courts  relating  thereto. 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1908.     1562  pp.     8°. 
( Twenty-second  annual  report  of  the  Commissioner  of  labor, 
1907.) 

60th  Congress,  1st  session.  House  doc.  no.  982.  5325 

For  later  laws  and  court  decisions  relating  to  injunctions,  boycotts, 

etc.,  see  the  Bulletin  of  the  Bureau  of  labor,  issued  bi-monthly 
9-35301  HD8051.A3     22<i 

The  law  relating  to  strikes,  blacklisting,  boycotts,  etc. 


{In  its  Twenty-first  annual  report,  1906,  pp.  917-960.     Washington, 

1907.     8°.)  HD8051.A3     21st 

59th  Congress,  2d  session.     House  doc.  no.  822.  5213 

Circuit  courts.  Decisions  of  Judge  Speer,  of  Georgia,  Judge 
Kicks,  of  Ohio,  and  Judge  Taft,  of  Ohio,  in  certain  cases 
involving  the  rights  and  duties  of  railroad  employes  and 
construction  of  the  antitrust  and  interstate-commerce 
laws. 

[  Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1893.]  35  pp.  8°. 
{53d  Congress,  Special  session.     Senate  misc.  doc.  no.  1^1 .) 

3142a 

57th  Congress,  1st  session,  1901-1902.  Senate.  Anti-injunc- 
tion bill.  Letters  from  various  labor  organizations  relat- 
ing to  the  substitution  of  Senate  bill  no.  4553  for  the  Hoar 
anti-injunction  bill,  S.  1118.     Apr.  1,  1902. 

[  Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1902.]  5  pp.  8°. 
{57th  Congress,  1st  session.     Senate  doc.  no.  278.)         4239 


BOYCOTTS  AND   INJUNCTIONS  25 

United  States.     57th  Congress,  1st  session,  1901-1902.  Senate.     A 
compilation  of  documents  relatinfj^  to  injunctions  in  con- 
spiracy cases,  together  with  arguments  and  decision  of  the 
court  in  case  of  Commonwealth  v.  Hunt,  4  Metcalf,  etc. 
February  13,  1902. — Ordered  to  be  printed  as  a  document. 
Washington:  Government  jynnting  office,  1902.     160  pp.     8°. 
(57th  Congress,  1st  session.     Senate  doc  no.  190.)         4234 
Contents. — Reports  from  the  Committee  on  the  judiciary  on  "Con- 
tempts of  court"  :  Senate  report  no.  827,  54th  Congress,  1st  session, 
April  30,  1896.     House  report  no.  2471,  pt.  1-2,  54th  Congress,  2d 
session,  January  8,  11,  1897. — Report  of  a  hearing  before  the  Com- 
mittee on  the  judiciary  of  the  House,  March  2:5,  1900,  on  the  bill 
"To  limit  the  meaning  of  the  word  'conspiracy,'  and  also  the  use 
of  'restraining  orders  and   injunctions,'   as  applied  to  disputes 
between  employers  and  employees"  .  .  .     Senate  doc.  no.  58, 56th 
Congress,  2d  session. — The  JBritish  conspiracy  and  protection  of 
property  act  and  its  operation,  by  A.  Maurice  Low  <;From  Bulletin 
33  of  the  United  States  Department  of  labor> — Injunctions  in  labor 
disputes;  report  read  at  meeting  of  the  Social  reform  club.  New 
York,  May  22,  1900. — The  modern  use  of  injunctions,  by  F.  J. 
Stimson    <From    Political    science    quarterly,    June,    1895> — 
Receivership  of  the  Northern  Pacific  railroad  company.     Report 
from  the  Committee  on  the  judiciary,  June  8,  1894.     House  report 
no.  1049,  53d  Congress,  2d  session. — Report  of  case,  arguments,  and 
decision  of  the  court  in  Commonwealth  [of  Massachusetts]  v.  Hunt 
(4  Mete). 
3-7052 

57th    Congress,   2d  session,    1902-1903.     Senate.     Petitions 

and  remonstrances  for  and  against  the  passage  of  the  bills 
(S.  1118,  S.  4553,  and  11.  R.  11060)  ''To  limit  the  meaning 
of  the  word  'conspiracy'  and  the  use  of  'restraining  orders 
and  injunctions'  in  certain  cases,"  with  a  list  of  organiza- 
tions so  petitioning. 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1903.  I4I  PP-  S°. 
(57th  Congress,  2d  session.     Senate  doc.  no.  115.)         4424 

■ 60th    Congress,    1st    session,    1907-1908.     Senate.     Certain 

injunction  and  labor  cases.     Papers. 
[  Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1908.]     42  PP-     S°- 
(60th  Congress,  1st  session.     Senate  doc.  no.  504.)       5266 
8-35503  HD7819.U5A5     1908 

Paper  relating  to  case  of  Ilitchmun  coal  and  coke 


company  v.  John  Mitchell  et  al. 
[  Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1908.]     6  pp.     8°. 
(60th  Congress,  1st  session.     Senate  doc.  no.  502.)         5269 

3_35480  HD7819.U5A5     1908a 


26  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

United  States.  60tli  Congress,  1st  session,  1907-1908.  Senate. 
Regulation  of  injunctions.  [Debate  on  Senate  bill  3732, 
regulating  injunctions  and  the  practice  of  the  district 
and  circuit  courts  of  the  United  States.     Apr.  17,  1908.] 

{In  Congressional  record,  60th  Congress,  Ist  session,  v.  42,  pt.  5,  pp. 
4846-4859.     Washington,  1908.     4°.)  Jll.R5,v.42,pt.  5 

Senate  resolution  81. 

{In  Congressional  record,  60th  Congress,  1st  session,  Jan.  23,  1908, 
V.  42,  pt.  2,  pp.  1009-1016.     Washington,  1908.     4°.) 

Directs  the  Committee  on  the  judiciary  of  the  Senate  or  any  subcom- 
mittee thereof  "to  speedily  investigate  and  inquire  into  all  of  the 
circumstances  connected  with  the  issuance  of  a  restraining  order 
in  the  case  of  Hitchman  coal  and  coke  company,  plaintiff,  against 
John  Mitchell  and  other  defendants  in  the  United  States  circuit 
court  for  the  northern  district  of  West  Virginia,  on  October  24, 
1907,"  and  "to  report  to  the  Senate  whether  any  additional  legis- 
lation is  necessary  for  the  protection  of  the  rights  and  privileges  of 
workingmen;  and  if  so,  to  report  such  legislation  without  delay." 
Various  papers  relating  to  the  case  are  included. 

Jll.R5,v.42,pt.2 

William  H.  Weber  and  John  Haddow.     Papers  on 

the  imprisonment  of  William  II.  Weber  and  Jolm.  Had- 
dow for  alleged  contempt  of  court,  and  their  pardon  by 
the  President. 
[WasTiington:  Government 'printing  office,  1908.]  11pp.  8°. 
(jSOtJi  Congress,  1st  session.  Senate  doc.  no.  52 Jf..)  5266 
Weber  and  Haddow  were  sent  to  prison  by  a  federal  court  in  Virginia 

for  alleged  violation  of  an  injunction. 
8-35484  HD7819.U6A5     1908b 

Congress.     House.     Committee  on  the  judiciary.     An  act  to 

regulate  commerce,  etc.     Plearings  on  House  bill  19745 
before  subcommittee  no.  3  of  the  Committee  on  the  judi- 
ciary, House  of  Representatives.     60th  Congress,  1st  ses- 
sion, [April  4-May  1,  1908]. 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1908.     7^9  pp.     8°. 
The  Hepburn  amendment  to  the  Sherman  anti-trust  act  of  1890. 
Charles  E.  Littlefield,  chairman  of  subcommittee. 
8-35497  HD2773     1908 

Argument   of   ]\Ir.    Samuel   Gompers.     Printed    by 

order  of  the  Committee. 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1908.     !34  pp.     8°. 
Regarding  the  use  of  injunctions  in  labor  disputes. 
&-35229  HD7819.U5A4     1908 


BOYCOTTS  AND   INJUNCTIONS  27 

United   States.     Congress.     House.     Committee  on    the   judiciary. 
Argument  of  Mr.  T.  C.  Spelling  in  favor  of  the  so-called 
anti-injunction  bills  and  all  labor  bills. 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1908.     89  pp.     8°. 
Includes  arguir  Tit  of  Samuel  Gompers,  pp.  39-62. 
Mr.  Spelling's  argument  was  also  printed  as  Senate  document  no.  525, 
60th  Congress,  1st  session 

8-35391  HD7819.U5A4     1908a 

Anti-injunction  bill.     Complete  hearings  before  the 

Committee  on  the  judiciary  of  the  House  of  Representa- 
tives on  the  bill  (IT.  R.  89)  entitled  "A  bill  to  limit  the 
meaning  of  the  word  'conspiracy '  and  the  use  of  'restrain- 
ing orders  and  injunctions'  in  certain  cases."  January 
13-March  22,  1904. 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1904-  {2),  71/i.  pp. 
8°. 

John  J.  Jenkins,  chairman. 

"House  report  no.  1522,  Fifty-seventh  Congress,  first  session.     Lim- 
iting the  meaning  of  the  word  conspiracy  "  :  pp.  354-391 . 
9-30480  HD7819.U5A4     1904 

Contempts  of  court.     Report  from  the  Committee 

on  the  judiciary,  Jan.  8,  1897. 
[  Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1897.]     4  PP-     ^°- 
{54th  Congress,  2d  session.     House  report  no.  2471.) 


3555 


Views  of  the  minority.     Jan.  11,  1897. 


[  Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1897.]     2  pp.     8°. 
(54th  Congress,  2d  session.     House  report  no.  2471,  pt.  2.) 

3566 
Reprinted  in  Senate  document  no.  190,  57th  Congress,  1st  session, 
pp.  5-10. 

Hearings  on  the  so-called  anti-injunction  bills  and 

all  labor  bills.     Printed  by  order  of  the  Committee. 

Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1908.     151  pp.     8°. 
John  J.  Jenkins,  chairman. 
Includes  arguments  of  T.  C.  Spelling  and  Samuel  Gompers,  and 

statement  of  Daniel  Davenport. 
9-31054  HD7819.U6A4     1908b 

Limiting    the    meaning    of    the    word    conspiracy. 

Report,  to  accompany  H.  R.  11000.     Apr.  10,  1902. 

[  Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1902.]     22  pp.     8°. 
{57th  Congress,  1st  session.     House  report  no.  1522.)    4404 
Submitted  by  Mr.  Ray, 


28  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

United  States.      Congress.      House.      Committee  on  the  judiciary. 
Views  of  the  minority. 
[  Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1902.]     16  pp.     8°. 
(57th  Congress,  1st  session.     House  report  no.  1522,  pt.  2.) 

4404 

Submitted  by  Mr.  Littlefield. 

Meaning  of  the  word  "conspiracy,"   etc.     Report, 

to  accompany  H.  R.  8917.     June  5,  1900. 
[  Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1900.]     2  pp.     8°. 
{56th  Congress,  1st  session.     House  report  no.  1987.)     4027 
Submitted  by  Mr.  Littlefield. 

Meaning  of  the  word  "conspiracy,"   etc.     Report, 


to  accompany  H.  R.  8917.     Dec.  3,  1900. 
[  Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1900.]     3  pp.     8°. 
(56th  Congress,  2d  session.     House  report  no.  2007.)      4212 
Submitted  by  Mr.  Littlefield. 

Limit  of  meaning  of  the  word  "conspiracy."     Feb.  4, 


1901.     Views  of  the  minority. 
[Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1901.]     2  pp.     8°. 
(56th  Congress,  2d  session.     House  report  no.  2007,  pt.  2.) 

4212 

Submitted  by  Mr.  Fleming. 

Receivership  of  the  Northern  Pacific  railroad  com- 


pany.    Report  from    the  Committee   on    the  judiciary. 
June  8,  1894. 
[  Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1894.]     ^^  PP-     ^°- 
(53d  Congress,  2d  session.     House  report  no.  lOJf.9.)      3271 

An  investigation  and  inquiry  "into  all  the  circumstances  connected 
with  the  issuance  of  writs  of  injunction  in  the  case  of  the  Farmers' 
loan  and  trust  company,  complainant,  against  the  Northern  Pacific 
railroad  company." 

Reprinted  in  Senate  document  no.  190,  57th  Congress,  Ist  session, 
pp.  122-143. 

Report  of  a  hearing  before  the  Committee,   March 


23,  1900,  on  the  bill  "To  limit  the  meaning  of  the  word 
'conspiracy,'  and  also  the  use  of  'restraining  orders  and 
injunctions,'  as  applied  to  disputes  between  employers 
and  employees  in  the  District  of  Columbia  and  territories, 
or  engaged  in  commerce  between  the  several  states,  Dis- 
trict of  Columbia,  and  territories,  and  with  foreign  na- 
tions." December  20,  1900. — Ordered  to  be  printed,  to 
accompany  S.  4233. 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1900.  (2),  73  pp. 
8°.     (56th  Congress,  2d  session.     Senate  doc.  no.  58.)     4033 

Reprinted  in  Senate  document  no.  190,  57th  Congress,  1st  session, 
pp.  11-85. 

2-24775  HD7819.U5A4     1900 


BOYCOTTS  AND  INJUNCTIONS  29 

United  States.  Congress.  Senate.  Committee  on  the  judiciary. 
Federal  injunctions.  Hearings  before  a  subcommittee  of 
the  Committee  on  the  judiciary,  United  States  Senate,  on 
tlie  bill,  S.  3724,  a  bill  regulatinj];  injunctions  and  the 
practice  of  the  district  and  circuit  courts  of  the  United 
States,  [January  27  to  February  3,1910]. 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1910.  63  pp.  S°. 
10-35202  JX1542.A5     1910 

Report,  to  accompany  S.  2984,  on  the  subject  of 

"contempts  of  court,"  as  enforced  by  the  federal  courts. 
Apr.  30,  1896. 
[Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1896.]     2  pp.     8°. 
(54th  Congress,  1st  session.     Senate  report  no.  827.)      3365 

Submitted  by  Mr.  Hill. 

Reprinted  in  Senate  document  no.  190,  57th  Congress,  Ist  session, 
pp.  3-4. 

Courts.     Federal  anti-trust  decisions.     Cases  decided  in  the 

United  States  courts  arising  under,  involving,  or  growing 
out  of  the  enforcement  of  the  anti-trust  act  of  July  2, 
1890  (26  Stat.,  209),  including  a  few  somewhat  similar 
decisions  not  based  upon  that  act,  1890-1899.  Prepared 
and  edited  by  James  A.  Finch,  by  direction  of  the  attorney- 
general. 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1907.  2  vols.  8°. 
See  indexes  under  Combinations,   conspiracies,  etc.,  and   under 

Labor  organizations. 
7-35252  HD2780.A2 

Industrial  commission.     Final  report.     Prepared  in  accord- 

ance with  an  act  of  Congress  approved  June  18,  1898. 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1902.     xi,  1259  pp. 
Maps.     Diagrams.     8°.     {The  commission's  Reports,  vol. 
xix.) 

"Injunctions  in  labor  disputes":  pp.  885-890. 

4-18105/2  HC101.A3,v.l9 

Report  on  labor  legislation. 

Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1900.     (2),  808  pp. 
8°.     {The  commission's  Reports,  vol.  v.) 

Includes  digests  of  existing  statutes  of  the  states  and  territoriot?,  aa 
follows:  General  labor,  by  Frederic  Jesup  Stimson. — Convict  labor, 
by  Victor  II.  Olmsted  and  William  M.  Steuart. — Mine  labor,  by 
Edward  Dana  Durand  in  collaboration  with  Eugene  Willison. 
"As  to  enforcement  of  the  labor  contract  by  iiijunrtion  or  ollierwise  " : 
pp.  G7-G8;  "Strikes,  boycotts,  pickcta,  etc.":  pp.  129-140. 


30  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

United  States.     Industrial  commission — Continued. 

For  a  later  record  of  legislation  relating  to  injunctions,  boycotts, 
etc.,  see  the  22d  annual  report  (for  1907)  of  the  United  States 
Bureau  of  labor,  and  the  Bulletin,  issued  bi-monthly  by  the 
same  Bureau. 

4-18095/7  HC101.A3,v.5 

Reports  on  labor  organizations,  labor  disputes,  and 

arbitration  [by  Charles  E.  Edgerton  and  E.  Dana  Durand] 
and  on  railway  labor  [by  Samuel  McCune  Lindsay]. 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1901.     cxxxvii,  1172 
pp.     Map.     Tables.     8°.     {The  commission's  Reports,  vol. 
xvii.) 

"Laws  and  court  decisions  as  to  labor  combinations  "  (pp.  cxiv-cxxv, 
547-629)  including:  Table  of  citations;  General  considerations; 
English  law  as  to  strikes  and  labor  combinations;  Legality  of 
strikes  in  themselves;  Enticement  of  employees;  Combinations 
to  procure  discharge  or  prevent  employment;  Intimidation  and 
picketing;  Boycotts;  Railway  strikes  and  boycotts:  (a)  General 
principles  laid  down  by  courts;  (b)  Specific  acts  and  methods  of 
strikers  held  illegal  by  the  courts;  (c)  Legislation  as  to  strikes  on 
railways;  The  injunction  in  labor  disputes:  (a)  Court  decisions 
as  to  injunctions;  (b)  Legal  criticisms  on  extended  use  of  injunc- 
tion; Legal  position  of  trade  unions 

4-18103/8  HC101.A3,v.  17 

Report  on  the  condition  of  foreign  legislation  upon 


matters  affecting  general  labor.     [Prepared  by  Frederic 
Jesup  Stimson]. 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1901.     Hi,  2Ji.2  pp. 
8°.     (The  commission's  Reports,  vol.  xvi.) 
Strikes,  boycotts,  etc.:  pp.  166-171 
4-18102/3  HC101.A3,v.l6 

Strike  commission,  1894-.     Report  on  the  Chicago  strike  of 

June-July,  1894,  with  appendices  containing  testimony, 
proceedings,  and  recommendations. 
Washington:  Governmentprinting  office,  1895.     liv,681  pp.     8°. 

Pub.  also  as  Senate  exec.  doc.  no.  7,  53d  Congress,  3d  session. 
Commissioners:  Carroll  D.  Wright,  John  D.   Kernan,  Nicholas  E. 

Worthington. 
8-32032  HD5325.I112.C582 

Voorhees,  Daniel  W.  Resolution  [in  regard  to  the  injunction  issued 
by  Judge  Jenkins  of  the  United  States  circuit  court  for  the 
eastern  district  of  Wisconsin  in  the  case  of  the  Farmers' 
loan  and  trust  company,  complainant,  against  the  North- 
ern Pacific  railroad  company].  In  the  Senate  of  the  United 
States.  Feb.  8,  1894. 
[Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1894-]  3  pp.  8°. 
{53d  Congress,  2d  session.     Senate  inisc.  doc.  no.  78.)     3167 


BOYCOTTS   AND   INJUNCTIONS  31 

Waring,  Luther  Hess.     The  law  and  the  gospel  of  labor. 

New  York  and  Washington:   The  Neale  puhlishing  company, 
1907.     UO  pp.     12°. 

"The  law  as  to  boycotts":  pp.  49-59;  "The  law  as  to  injunctions": 
pp.  61-70. 

7-29710  HD6495.U4W2 

Watson,  Samuel.     The  Ann  Arbor  cases. 

{In  Tennessee  bar  association.     Proceedings  of  the  twelfth  annual 
meeting,  July  13-14,  1893,  pp.  205-209.     Nashville,  1894.     8°.) 

Willingham,    Wright.     Labor   unions    and    kindred    organizations 
from  the  lawyer's  standpoint. 

{In  Georgia  bar  association.     Report  of  the  25th  annual  session.  May 

28-29,  1908,  pp.  178-194.     Macon,  [1908].     8°.) 
Reprinted  in  American  legal  news,  Jan.  1909,  v.  20,  pp.  5-11. 
67382°— 11 3 


ARTICLES  IN  PERIODICALS 

1884.  Thompson,  Seymour  D.     Injunctions  against  criminal  acts. 

American  law  review,  July-Aug.,  188 If.,  v.  18:  599-617. 

1885.  Sartorius    von    Waltershausen,    A.     Boycotten,    ein    neues 

Kampfmittel  der  amerikanischen  Gewerkvereine. 
JaJirhilcJier  fiir  Nationaldkonomie  und  Statistih,  1885,  v.  J^5: 
1-18.  HB5.J3,v.46 

1885.     Interdicts  against  dealing  with  particular  traders. 
Irish  law  times,  Jan.  21^.,  1885,  v.  19:  4^-45. 

1885.     Actionable  boycotting. 

Irish  law  times,  Aug.  22,  1885,  v.  19:  448-444. 

Reprinted  in  Weekly  law  bulletin,  Oct.  12,  1885,  v.  14,  pp.  232-234; 
and  in  Washington  law  reporter,  Oct.  24,  1885,  v.  13,  pp.  669-671. 

1885.  Boycotting. 

Justice  of  the  peace,  Oct.  31,  1885,  v.  49:  689-691. 

1886.  Hammond,  William  A.     The  evolution  of  the  boycott. 

Forum,  June,  1886,  v.  1:  369-376.  ^  AP2.F8,v.l 

1886.     Mason,  James  M.     The  legal  aspect  of  the  strike  and  boycott. 
Kansas  law  journal,  June  12,  1886,  v.  3:  273-279. 

1886.     Thacher,  Sherman  D.     Boycotting, 

New  Englander,  Dec,  1886,  v.  45:  1038-1042.     AP2.N5,v.45 

1886.     Stephen,  James  Fitzjames.     On  the  suppression  of  boycotting. 
Nineteenth  century,  Dec,  1886,  v.  20:  765-784.    ap4.n7,v.20 

1886.  Atkins,  Thomas  S.     The  criminahty  of  boycotting;  [charge 

delivered  to  the  grand  jury  of  the  Hustings  court  of 
Richmond,  Va.,  Sept.  28,  1886]. 
Virginia  law  journal,  Dec,  1886,  v.  10:  707-709. 

Reprinted  in  Irish  law  times,  Jan.  8,  1887,  v.  21,  pp.  17-18. 

1887.  Brigham,  Chfford.     Strikes  and  boycotts  as  indictable  con- 

spiracies at  common  law. 
American  law  review,  Jan.-Feb.,  1887 ,  v.  21:  4^-^9- 

Reprinted  in  Irish  law  times,  Feb.  26,  Mar.  5,  12,  1887,  v.  21,  pp. 
115-118, 131-134,  146-147. 
32 


BOYCOTTS  AND  INJUNCTIONS:   PERIODICALS  33 

1887.     Dorman,  Lester  M.     The  boycott  and  its  methods. 
Criminal  law  magazine,  Jan.,  1887,  v.  9:  1-15. 

The  criminality  of  boycotting;   charge  of  Judge  Atkins  of  the  Rich- 
mond (Va.)  Hustings  court,  Sept.  28,  1886:  pp.  15-17. 

1887.     An  American  view  of  boycotting. 

Irish  law  times,  Apr.  23,  1887,  v.  21:  228-229. 
Reprinted  from  the  New  York  chronicle. 

1887.     Wellford,   B.   R.,   jr.     The  legaUty   of  boycotting;  [opinion 
dehvered  in  the  circuit  court  of  Richmond,  Va.,  Feb.  7, 

1887]. 
Virginia  law  journal,  Apr.,  1887,  v.  11:  196-202. 

1887.     Atkins,    Thomas    S.     The    hiw    of    conspiracy:  boycotting; 
[opinion  dehvered  in  the  Hustings  court  of  Richmond, 
Va.,  Feb.  7,  1887]. 
Virginia  law  journal,  June,  1887,  v.  11:  324-331. 

1887.  Wigmore,  John  H.     The  boycott  and  kmdred  practices  as 

ground  for  damages. 
American  law  review,  July-August,  1887,  v.  21:  509-532. 

1888.  Selfridge,  Arthur  James.     American  law  of  strikes  and  boy- 

cotts as  crimes. 
American  law  review,  Mar.-Apr.,  1888,  v.  22:  233-250. 

Reprinted  in  Irish  law  times,  May  5,  19,  1888,  v.  22,  pp.  218-220, 
242-244. 

1888.  Actionable  boycotting. 

Irisli  law  times,  Sept.  8,  15,  1888,  v.  22:  ^51-^52,  465-^66. 

1889.  Cheyney,  E.  P.     Decisions  of  the  courts  in  conspiracy  and 

boycott  cases. 
Political  science  quarterly,  June,  1889,  v.  4-  261-278. 

Hl.P8,v.4 

1891.  Burnett,  John.     The  boycott  as  an  element  in  trade  disputes. 

Economic  journal.  Mar.,  1891,  v.  1:  163-173.        HBl.E3,v.l 

1892.  McMurtrie,  Richard  C.    Equity  jurisdiction  apphod  to  crimes 

and  misdemeanors. 
American  law  register  and  review,  Jan.,  1892,  v.  31:  1-17. 

1892.     Courts  of  equity  and  intimidation  by  hibor  unions. 

National  corporation  reporter,  Oct.  8,  15,  1892,  v.  5:  99-100, 
124. 

1892.     Lewis,  William  Draper.     Injunctions  to  restrain  Hbels,  aiul 
courts  of  criminal  equity.     [EcHtorial]. 
American  law  register  and  review,  Nov.,  1892,  v.  31:  782-797. 


34  LIBRAKY  OF   CONGRESS 

1893.     Federal  injunctions  against  boycotts.     [Notes]. 

American  law  review,  May-June,  1893,  v.  21:  Ifi5-I^10. 

1893.     Lewis,   William  Draper.     The   courts   and   striking   raUroad 
employees.     The  Ann  Arbor  cases,     p^ditorial  note]. 
American  law  register  and  review,  May,  1893,  v.  32:  481-4-89. 

1893.     Walker,  Aldace  F.     Recent  labor  rulings  by  federal  courts. 
Forum,  May,  1893,  v.  15:  311-322.  ^  AP2.r8,v.l5 

1893.     Actionable  boycotting. 

Law  times.  May  6,  1893,  v.  95:  5-6. 

1893.     Gunton,  George.     Economics  of  strikes  and  boycotts. 

Social  economist.  May,  1893,  v.  4:  257-266.  Hl.G9,v.4 

1893.     [Comment  on  recent  court  decisions  relating  to  labor  unions]. 
Yale  review,  May,  1893,  v.  2:  8-12.  Hl.Y2,v.2 

1893.     Mason,  Norman  T.     Organized  labor  and  the  law. 

American  journal  of  j^olitics,  Aug.,  1893,  v.  3:  188-196. 

Hl.A5,v.3 

1893.  Dickson,  Charles  A.     Boycotting. 

Central  law  journal,  Sept.  1,  1893,  v.  37:  166-169. 

Reprinted  in  Albany  law  journal,  Sept.  30,  1893,  v.  48,  pp.  269-271. 

1894.  [Lewis,  William  Draper.]     Injunction  to  keep  men  at  work. 

[Editorial]. 
American  law  register  and  review,  Jan.,  1894,  'V-  33:  81-82. 

1894.     Lewis,  William  Draper.     Injunctions  to  restrain  strikes  again. 
[Notes  and  comments  on  recent  decisions]. 
American  law  register  and  review,  Feb.,  1894,  "f^-  33:  147-150. 

1894.     Enjoining  a  threatened  railway  strike. 

American  law  review,  Mar.-Apr.,  1894,  '^-  ^8:  269-272. 

1894.     Pingrey,  D.  H.     Boycotting,  its  legal  phase. 

Central  law  journal,  May  18,  1894,  v.  38:  427-430. 

1894.     Bullard,   Herbert   S.     The  injunction   as  a  remedy  for  the 
boycott. 
Yale  law  journal,  June,  1894,  v.  3:  211-217. 

1894.     The  law  of  strikes.     [Notes]. 

American  law  review,  July-Aug.,  1894,  '^'  ^8-  587-591. 


BOYCOTTS   AND   INJUNCTIONS:   PERIODICALS  35 

1894.     Reed,  Chester  A.     Peaceable  boycotting. 

American  academy  of  political  and  social  science.     Annals, 
July,  1894,  V.  5:  28-47.  Hl.A4,v6. 

A  defence  of  the  boycott  and  an  argument  against  the  U!?e  of  the 
injunction  as  a  means  of  suppressing  it. 

1894.     Selover,  George  II.     Boycotts  as  conspiracies. 

Minnesota  law  journal,  July,  1894,  "V-  ^'  167-173. 

1894.     Stewart,  Ardemus.     Tiie  legal  side  of  the  strike  question. 

American  law  register  and  review,  Sept.,  1894,  v.  33:  609-622. 

1894.     Bateman,     Warner    M.   Injunctions    against    labor  unions. 
[Letter]. 
Central  law  journal,  Sept.  28,  1894,  'V-  ^9:  265-266. 

1894.     The  Debs  case.     [Editorial]. 

Nation,  Sept.  13,  1894,  'V-  59:  190-191.  ap2.N2,v.59 

"The  issue  is  briefly  the  determination  of  the  quesliou  whether 

courts  shall  assume  the  function  of  inflicting  summary  punij^h- 

ment  without  jury  trial  for  acts  punishable  by  ordinary  criminal 

proceeding." 

1894.     Aiken,  William  P.     Legal  restraint  of  labor  strikes. 
Yale  law  journal,  Oct.,  1894,  '^'-  4-  13-26. 

1894.     Gregory,  S.  S.     The  Debs  case. 

Chicago  legal  news,  Nov.  3,  1894,  '^-  ^'^-  82. 

On   the    question   of   the  constitutionality  of   the  issuance  of  an 
injunction  in  this  case. 

1894.  Lewis,  W.  D.     A  protest  against  administering  criminal  law 

by  injunction — the  Debs  case. 
American  latv  register  and  review,  Dec,  1894,  v.  33:  879-883. 

1895.  Philips,  John  F.     Strikes  and  injunctions. 

American  lawyer,  1895,  v.  3:  18. 

1895.     Heckel,  IVIax  von.     Der  Boykott. 

JaJirhucher  fiir  National'dkonomie  und  Statistic,  1895,  v.  65: 

481-510.  HB5.J3.V.65 

"Benutzte  Quellen  und  Litteratur: "'  p.  481. 

1895.     Erwin,  James  S.     Are  strikes  preventable  by  judicial  action? 
Criminal  law  magazine,  Jan.,  1895,  v.  17:  1-10. 

1895.     Stanton,  Stephen  B.     Tlie  mandamus  as  a  moans  of  settling 
strikes. 
American  law  register  and  review,  Feb.,  1895,  v.  34:  102-119. 


36  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

1895.     Government  by  injunction.     [Note], 

American  law  review,  Mar -Apr.,  1895,  v.  29: 

1895.     Stimson,  F.  J.     The  modern  use  of  injunctions. 

Political  science  quarterly,  June,  1895,  v.  10:  189-202. 

Hl.P8,v.lO 

Reprinted  in  Senate  document,  no.  190,  57th  Congress,  1st  session, 

pp.  114-121.  4234 

1895.     Upson,  William  H.     Injunctions  and  strikes. 
BihliotJieca  sacra,  July,  1895,  v.  52:  549-552. 

1895.  Strikes  and  boycotting. 

Irish  law  times,  July  13,  1895,  v.  29:  339-340. 

1896.  Lorimer,  J.  C.     Trade  union — freedom  of  contract — malice- 

picketing. 
Juridical  review,  1896,  v.  8:  319-321. 

Reprinted  in  American  law  review,   Sept.-Oct.,   1896,  v.  30,  pp. 

763-765. 

1896.     Injunction — strikes.     Hamilton-Brown  shoe  co.  v.  Saxey  etal. 
Supreme  court  of  Missouri,  Division  no.  1,  Nov.  26,  1895. 
[Annotated  case]. 
Central  law  journal,  Jan.  24,  1896,  v.  42:  74-78. 

1896.     Woollen,  Evans.     Labor  and  the  injunction. 

Yale  review.  May,  1896,  v.  5:  39-50.  Hl.Y2,v.5 

1896.     Government  by  injunction. 

Gunton's  magazine,  Oct.,  1896,  v.  11:  242-248.       Hl.G9,v.ll 

1896.     Yarros,  Victor.     Labor's  rights  in  the  courts. 

American  federationist,  Nov.,  1896,  v.  3:  181-183. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.3 

1896.     Injunction — conspiracy    to    injure    business.     Vegelahn    v. 
Guntner.     Supreme    judicial    court     of-  Massachusetts, 
Oct.  27,  1896.     [Annotated  case]. 
Central  law  journal,  Dec.  4,  1896,  v.  43:  4^4~4^^ 

1896.     Curtis,  Leonard  E.     Labor  riots  and  so-called  "government 
by  injunction." 
Engineering  magazine,  Dec,  1896,  v.  12:  381-394- 

TAl.E59,v.l2 

1896.     "Picketing."     Injunctions  against  strikers. 

Harvard  law  review,  Dec.  26,  1896,  v.  10:  301. 


BOYCOTTS  AND   INJUNCTIONS:   PERIODICALS  37 

1897.     Labor  combinations  and  the  law. 

Albany  law  journal,  Apr.  17,  1897,  v.  55:  250-251. 
Reprinted  from  the  Boston  herald. 

1897.     Government  by  injunction. 

American  federationist,  June,  1897,  v.  li.:  82. 

An  interview  with  Samuel  Gompers,  from  the  ^^■ashington  post. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.4 

1897.     Barker,  Wliarton.     Are  the  rights  of  capital  superior  to  the 
rights  of  man  ? 
American  (Philadelpliia) ,  Aug.  21,  1897,  v.  27:  117-119. 

AP2.A317,v.27 

A  criticism  of  the  action  of  certain  courts  of  Pennsylvania  and  West 
Virginia  in  enjoining  striking  coal  miners  from  commimicating 
with  miners  continuing  at  work. 

1897.     Sedgwick,  A.  G.     The  strike  injunctions. 

Nation,  Aug.  26,  1897,  v.  65:  160-161.  AP2.N2,v.65 

1897.     Federal  injunction  against  strikes  and  lockouts  in  West  \iv- 
ginia. 
American  law  review,  Sept.-Oct.,  1897,  v.  31:  761-76^. 

1897.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Injunctions  unrespected.     As  a  factor  in 
strikes  they  must  go.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Sept.,  1897,  v.  I^:  159-160. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.4 
1897.     Injunctions  in  labor  disputes. 

Chicago  times-herald,  Sept.  19,  1897,  v.  44,  pt.  3:  25-28. 

The  following  questions  were  submitted  by  the  Sunday  times-herald 
to  eminent  juribts  and  prominent  laymen:  1.  What  are  your  views 
on  the  power  and  practice  of  courts  in  issuing  injunctions  in 
labor  disputes?  2.  How  is  such  power  derived,  and  is  it  misused? 
3.  Do  injunctions  interfere  with  the  constitutional  guarantee  of 
trial  by  jury?  4.  Should  Congress  specifically  define  and  limit 
the  power  of  courts  in  issuing  injunctions?  Among  others,  replies 
were  received  from  P.  S.  Grosscup,  Murray  F.  Tuley,  James 
McCabe,  Edward  F.  Dunne,  and  Henry  M.  Shepard. 

1897.     Sedgwick,  A,  G.     An  injunction  symposium. 

Nation,  Sept.. 30,  1897,  v.  65:  256-257.  ap2.N2.v.65 

1897.     "Government  by  injunction"  in  America. 

Saturday  review,  Sept.  25,  1897,  v.  84:  335.  AP4.S3,v.84 

1897.     Hargis,  Thomas  F.     Government  by  injunction. 

American  federationist,  Dec,  1897,  v.  4-  227-228. 

HD8056.A5A2,v.4 

1 I2S2I 


38  LIBEAKY  OF   CONGRESS 

1897.     Dean,  Ben  S.     Government  by  injunction. 
Green  lag,  Dec,  1897,  v.  9:  540-5U. 

1897.  Peterkin,  W.  G.     Government  by  injunction. 

Virginia  law  register,  Dec,  1897,  v.  3:  549-563. 

1898.  Injunctions  against  boycotts:  injunction  against  allowing  a 

city  council  to  readvertise  a  bid  which  it  had  refused  to 
let  to  the  lowest  bidder  at  the  dictation  of  labor  leaders. 
American  law  review,  Jan.- Feb.,  1898,  v.  32:  117-119. 

1898.     Injunctions  against  boycotting;  labor  association  interfering 
with  the  business  and  freedom  of  action  of  third  persons. 
American  law  review,  Jan.-Feb.,  1898,  v.  32:  124-127. 

1898.     Edwards,  Percy  L.     Government  by  injunction. 
Albany  law  journal,  Jan.,  1898,  v.  57:  8-12. 

1898.     Lewis,  William  Draper.     Strikes  and  courts  of  equity. 
American  law  register,  Jan.,  1898,  v.  46:  1-12. 
References:  pp.  1-2. 

1898.     Peterkin,  William  G.     Government  by  injunction, 
American  lawyer,  Jan.,  1898,  v.  6:  5-8. 

A  paper  read  at  the  twelfth  annual  meeting  of  the  West  Virginia  bar 
association. 

1898.     Patteson,  S.  S.  P.     Government  by  injunction. 
Virginia  law  register,  Jan.,  1898,  v.  3:  625-635. 

1898.     Stimson,  Frederic  J.     The  true  attitude  of  courts  and  legis- 
latures upon  labor  questions. 
Green  hag,  Mar.,  1898,  v.  10:  103-107. 

1898.     Gregory,  Charles  Noble.     Government  by  injunction. 
Harvard  law  review,  Mar.  25,  1898,  v.  11:  4^7-511. 

1898.     Stillman,  James  W.     The  misuse  of  injunctions. 

Arerm,  Aug.,  1898,  v.  20:  194-206.  AP2.A6,v.20 

1898.     The  injunction  against  the  striking  laborers  of  the  American 
steel  and  wire  company. 
American  law  review,  Nov. -Dec,  1898,  v.  32:  894-896. 

1898.  Gompers,  Samuel.     Injunctions  and  strikes.     [Editoriall. 

American  federationist,  Nov.,  1898,  v.  5:  183-184- 

HD8055.A5A2,v.5 

1899.  Yarros,  Victor.     Labor  and  "government  by  injunction.' 

American  federationist,  Feh.,  1899,  v.  5:  231-233. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.6 


BOYCOTTS  AND  INJUNCTIONS:   PERIODICALS  39 

1899.     Gompers,   Samuel.     The   boycott   as  a  legitimate  weapon. 
[Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Oct.,  1899,  v.  6:  192-195. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.6 

1899.  Thompson,  Seymour  D.     Injunction  against  boycotting. 

American  law  review,  Nov. -Dec,  1899,  v.  33:  885-888. 

1900.  Tandy,  Francis  D.     Strikes,  trusts,  boycotts,  and  blacklists. 

Arena,  Feb.,  1900,  v.  23:  194-203.  ap2.A6,v.23 

1900.     Thompson,  Seymour  D.     Injunctions  against  boycotting. 
American  law  review,  Mar.-Apr.,  1900,  v.  34:  161-185. 

1900.     Gompers,  Samuel.     The  right  of  picketing.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Mar.,  1900,  v.  7:  68-69. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.7 

1900.     Morancy,  Frank  W.     Injunctions  against  boycotting. 

American  law  review,  May- June,  1900,  v.  34:  4^^-469. 

1900.     Gompers,  Samuel.     The  right  of  picketing.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist.  May,  1900,  v.  7:  136-147. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.7 

1900.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Judge  Freedman's  notorious  injunction. 
[Editorial]. 
American  federationist,^  June,  1900,  v.  7:  162-164. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.7 

1900.     Gompers,  Samuel.     The  happiness  not  to  know.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  July,  1900,  v.  7:  212-214- 

On  injunctions  against  "picketing";  reply  to  an  article  by  Ambrose 
Bierce  in  the  New  York  journal  for  June  3,  1000. 

HD8055.A6A2,v.7 

1900.     Right  of  picketing  judicially  sustained. 

American  federationist,  Aug.,  1900,  v.  7:  240-242. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.7 

1900.  Gompers,  Samuel.     English  hostility  to  injunctions.     [Edi- 

torial]. 
American  federationist,  Nov.,  1900,  v.  7:  350-351. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.7 

1901.  Gompers,   Samuel.     Conflicting  decisions  on  labor's  rights. 

[Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Mar.,  1901,  v.  8:  80-82. 

HD8055.A5A2.V.8 


40  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

1901.     Gompers,    Samuel.     Injunctions    to    prevent   strikes.     [Edi- 
torial]. 
American  federationist,  May,  1901,  v.  8:  164-166. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.8 

1901.     Gompers,  Samuel.    More  abuse  of  the  injunction.    [Editorial.]. 
American  federationist,  June,  1901,  v.  8:  216-218. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.8 

1901.     Wilson,  W.  B.     The  blanket  injunction. 

American  federationist,  Sept.,  1901,  v.  8:  340-341- 

HD8055.A5A2,v.8 

1901.     Gompers,   Samuel.     Rights   achieved   must   be   maintained. 
Judicial  usurpation  of  legislative  functions.     It  even  nau- 
seates the  press.     [Editorials]. 
American  federationist,  Sept.,  1901,  v.  8:  359-360. 

On  "the  recent  injunction  epidemic."  HD8055.A5A2,v.8 

1901.  Gompers,  Samuel.     The  right  of  "persuasion."     [Editorial]. 

American  federationist,  Nov.,  1901,  v.  8:  4'^4-4'^^- 

HD8055.A5A2,v.8 

1902.  Gompers,  Samuel.     A  worthy  judicial  exception.     [Editorial]. 

American  federationist.  Mar.,  1902,  v.  9:  123-124. 

Favorable  comment  on  a  court  decision  in  an  injunction  case  in 
Chicago.  HD8055.A5A2,v.9 

1902.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Anti-injunction  legislation.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Apr.,  1902,  v.  9:  180-181. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.9 

1902.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Conflicting  judicial  decisions.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist.  May,  1902,  v.  9:  234-236. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.9 

1902.     Gompers,   Samuel.     Injunctions  can't  restrain   free  speech. 
[Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  June,  1902,  v.  9:  299-301. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.9 

1902.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Cincinnati  brewery  bosses  enjoin  A.  F. 
of  L.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  June,  1902,  v.  9:  302-304- 

HD8055.A5A2,v.9 

1902.     Protest  against  injunction  abuse. 

American  federationist,  June,  1902,  v.  9:  305-306. 

Address  by  the  executive  council,  American  federation  of  labor,  to 
the  wage  workers  of  America.  HD8055.A5A2,v.9 


BOYCOTTS   AND  INJUNCTIONS:   PERIODICALS  41 

1902.     Gompers,  Samuel.     An  "anti,"  changed  to  a  "  pro  "-injunc- 
tion bill.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  July,  1902,  v.  9:  370-372. 
On  bill  H.  R.  11060,  57th  Congress,  1st  session. 

HD8055.A6A2,v.9 

1902.     The  misuse  of  injunctions. 

Gunton's  magazine,  Sept.,  1902,  v.  23:  226-233.      hi.g9,v.23 

1902.     Post,  Louis  F.     The  abuse  of  injunctions. 

American  federationist,  Oct.,  1902,  v,  9:  685-687. 

HI>8055.A5A2,v.9 

1902.     Flower,  B.  O.     Promoters  of  anarchy  and  social  disorder. 

Arena,  Oct.,  1902,  v.  28:  42^-428.  ap2.A6,v.28 

On  injunctions  against  strikes. 

1902.  Gompers,   Samuel.     The  A.   F.   of  L.    and   the   "boycott." 

[Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Nov.,  1902,  v.  9:  808-810. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.9 

1903.  Notes  of  recent  decisions.     Injunctions  against  intimidation. 

Am^erican  law  review,  Jan.-Feb.,  1903,  v.  37:  148-149. 

1903.     Notes  of    recent    decisions.     Injunction  against  persuading 
railway  employes  to  strike. 
American  law  review.  Mar. -Apr.,  1903,  v.  37:  285-289. 

Discussion  of  an  injunction  issued  by  Judge  Adams  of  the  United 
States  circuit  court  at  St.  Louis  against  the  officers  of  the  Brother- 
hood of  railway  trainmen  and  the  Brotherhood  of  locomotive  fire- 
men. 

1903.     Haldane,  R.  B.      The  labourer  and  the  law. 

Contemporary  review,  Mar.,  1903,  v.  S3:  362-372. 

AP4.C7,v.33 

1903.     Miller,  James  A.     The  courts  on  organized  labor. 

Iron  age,  Mar.  5,  1903,  v.  71:  19-22.  Tl.i7,v.71 

"Reprint  from  volume  II,  No.  1,  Bulletin  Corporation.'<  auxiliary 
company,  Cleveland." 

1903.     White,  Henry.     Remedies  for  the  boycott. 

Nation,  Mar.  19,  1903,  v.  76:  222-223.  AP2.N2,v.76 

1903.     The  Waterbury  injunction. 

Gunton's  magazine,  Apr.,  1903,  v.  24:  283-288.     Hl.G9,v.24 

1903.     Labor  injunctions. 

Gunton's  magazine,  Apr.,  1903,  v.  24:  348-351.    hi.G9,v.24 


42  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

1903.     Steffee,  John  G.     The  Taff  Vale  case. 

American  law  review,  May- June,  1903,  v.  37:  385-39 Jf.. 

1903.     Notes  of    recent    decisions.     Injunction  against  persuading 
railwa}^  employes  to  strike:  dissolution   of  injunction  by 
Judge  Adams. 
American  law  review,  May-June,  1903,  v.  37:  461-462. 

1903.     Gompers,  Samuel.     New  judicial  usurpation  through  injunc- 
tions.    [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  May,  1903,  v.  10:  362-36 4. 

HD8065.A5A2,v.lO 

1903.     Wyman,  Bruce.     The  law  as  to  the  boycott. 
Green  lag,  May,  1903,  v.  15:  208-215. 

1903.     Seabury,  Samuel.     The  abuses  of  injunction. 

Arena,  June,  1903,  v.  29:  561-567.  AP2.A6,v.29 

1903.     Crosby,  Ernest  H.     The  abuses  of  injunctions. 

Arena,  July,  1903,  v.  30:  48-51.  AP2.A6,v.30 

1903.     Davenport,  Daniel.     The  anti-boycott  movement. 

Iron  age,  July  16,  1903,  v.  72:  2.  Tl.i7,v.72 

1903.     Davenport,  Daniel.     The   boycott   and  how   it   can  be  de- 
stroyed. 
Iron  age,  July  23,  1903,  v.  72:  54-55.  tii7,v.72 

1903.     Gompers,  Samuel.     A  damage  suit  or  prosecution  to  scare  or 
intimidate  us — well!     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Oct.,  1903,  v.  10:  1038-1039. 

A  defense  of  boycotting  as  practiced  by  the  American  federation  of 
labor.  HD8055.A5A2,v.lO 

1903.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Some  more  judge-made  law  and  labor. 
[Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Oct.,  1903,  v.  10:  1039-1042. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.lO 

1903.     The  legal  status  of  the  boycott. 

Iron  age,  Oct.  1,  1903,  v.  72:  22-23.  Tll7,v.72 

1903.     Notes    of    recent    decisions.     Injunction    to    protect    labor 
unions. 

American  law  review,  Nov. -Dec,  1903,  v.  37:  932-934. 

Comment  on  the  decision  of  the  United  States  circuit  court  at  St. 
Louis  in  the  case  of  Boyer  vs.  the  Western  union  telegraph  com- 
pany. 


\y 


BOYCOTTS  AND  INJUNCTIONS:   PERIODICALS  43 

1904.     Kleeberg,  August.     Ein  Beitrag  zur  Revision  der  Begriffe 
Strike,  Lockout  und  Boycott. 
Jakrhuch  fiir  Gesetzgehung,   Verwaltung  und  VollsvArtscliaft, 
1904,  V.  28:  1053-1090.  H5J2,v.28 

Bibliographical  foot-notes. 

1904.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Invading  labor's  rights.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Feb.,  1904,  v.  11:  129-130. 
A  defense  of  the  use  of  the  boycott  by  labor  organizations. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.ll 

1904.     Darling,  Charles  R.     The  law  of  strikes  and  boycotts. 
American  law  register,  Feb.,  1904,  "i'-  ^2:  73-117. 

1904.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Misrepresenting  the  anti-injunction  bill. 
[Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Mar.,  1904,  v.  11:  218-220. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.ll 

1904.     Bayne,  Howard  R.     To  prevent  injunctions  in  trade-union 
disputes. 
Railroad  gazette,  Mar.  18,  1904,  v.  36:  212-213. 

TFl.R2,v.36 

1904.     President  Gompers'  argument  on  anti-injunction  bill,  IT.  R. 
89,  before  Committee  on  judiciary,  House  of  Representa- 
tives, Feb.  8,  1904. 
American  federationist,  Apr.,  1904,  v.  11,  309-312. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.ll 

1904.     Restraming  injunctions. 

Gunton's  rnagazine,  Apr.,  1904,  'V-  26:  291-299.    Hl.G9,v.26 

1904.     Rooker,  William  Velpau.     A  thesis  on  injunctions. 
American  federationist,  May,  1904,  v.  11:  381-385. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.ll 

1904.     Furuseth,  Andrew.     The  essence  of  injunctions. 

American  federationist,  May,  1904,  v.  11:  386-391. 

Argument  in  favor  of  the  anti-injunction  bill  delivered  before  the 
Committee  on  labor  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  Mar.  24,  1!)04. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.ll 

1904.     Gompers,  Samuel.     The  injunction  mania.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  May,  1904,  v.  11:  397-399. 

IED8055.A5A2,v.ll 

1904.     Livernash,  Edward  J.     Why  injunctions  should  not  apply. 
American  federationist,  July,  1904,  v.  11:  602. 

Addressed  to  the  Committee  on  the  judiciary  of  tlie  House  of  Rep- 
resentatives. HD8056.A6A2,v.ll 


44  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

1904.     Edwards,  P.  L,     Labor  strikes  and  injunctions. 
Central  law  journal,  July  8,  1904,  v.  59:  23-28. 

1904.     Boycotting — injunction — strikes. 

American  architect  {International  ed.),  Aug.  27,  1904,  v.  85: 
70-71.  NAl.A32,v.85 

Case  of  Gray  et  al.  v.  Building  trades  council,  et  al.,  Supreme  court 
of  Minnesota,  97  Northwestern  reporter,  p.  663. 

1904.  Torrey,  James  H.     Labor  and  the  law. 

American  lawyer,  Oct.,  1904,  v.  12:  427-430. 
"The  boycott":  pp.  427-428. 

1905.  Elm,  Adolph  von.     Der  Boykott    als  Waffc    im  wirtschaft- 

liclien  Kampf. 
SozialistiscJie  Monatshefte,  Jan.,  1905,  v.  11:  37-43. 

HX6.S6,v.ll 

1905.     Gompers,  Samuel,     A  just  court  decision.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Feb.,  1905,  v.  12:  76-78. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l2 

1905.     Tempering  ''government  by  injunction." 

Literary  digest,  Feh.  18,  1905,  v.  30:  232-233.     AP2.L58,v.30 

1905.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Some  notions  on  injunction  legislation. 
[Editorial]. 
American  federationist.  Mar.,  1905,  v.  12:  141-144- 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l2 

1905.     Clark,   Lindley   D.     The  present  legal  status  of  organized 
labor  in  the  United  States. 
Journal  of  political  economy.  Mar.,  1905,  v.  13:  173-200. 

HBl.J7,v.l3 

Injunctions:  pp.  180-199. 

1905.     Beveridge,  W.  H.     The  reform  of  trade  union  law. 
Economic  review,  April  15,  1905,  v.  15:  129-149. 

HBl.E4,v.l5 
1905.     rieise,  Stephan.     Schlimmer  als  Streikbruch. 

Neue  Zeit,  May  27,  1905,  v.  23:  290-292.  HX6.N6,v.23 

1905.     Edwards,  P.  L.     Labor  strikes  and  injunctions, 

Albany  law  journal,  July,  1905,  v.  67:  209-214. 

1905.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Jenkins  on  injunctions  and  strikes,     [Edi- 
torial], 
American  federationist,  July,  1905,  v.  12:  44^-44^- 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l2 


BOYCOTTS  AND   INJUNCTIONS:   PERIODICALS  45 

1905.  Gompers,  Samuel.     No  property  right  in  labor.     [Editorial]. 

American  federationist,  Nov.,  1905,  v.  12:  SSo-SSO. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 

1906.  Gompers,  Samuel.     Two  courts  on  picketing.     [Editorial]. 

American  federationist,  Jan.,  1906,  v.  13:  28-31. 

"The  position  taken  is  that  picketing  is  an  invasion  of  property 
rights  and  as  such  may — nay,  should — be  enjoined  by  courts  of 
equity."  HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 

1906.     Freund,  Ernst.     Recent  Illinois  decisions  regarding   injunc- 
tions in  the  course  of  strikes. 
Journal  of  political  economy,  Jan.,  1906,  v.  I4:  43-46. 

HBl.J7,v.l4 

1906.     Bryan,  James  Wallace.     Injunctions  against  strikes. 

American  law  review,  J  an.- Feb.,  1906,  v.  4O:  42-57. 

1906.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Developments  in  injunction  fight.     [Edi- 
torial]. 
American  federationist,  Feb.,  1906,  v.  13:  89-92. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 

1906.     Bryan,  James  Wallace.     Injunctions   against    boycotts    and 
similar  unlawful  acts. 
American  law  review.  Mar. -Apr.,  1906,  v.  4O:  196-211. 

1906.     Gompers,  Samuel,     Judge  Holdom's  injunction  frenz}^.    [Edi- 
torial]. 
American  federationist.  Mar.,  1906,  v.  13:  156-158. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 

1906.     Ashley,  W.  J.     Trade  unions  and  the  law. 

National  review.  Mar.,  1906,  v.  >^7;  56-67.       AP4.N25,v.47 
An  examination  of  the  purport  of  recent  judicial  decit^ion^  in  regard 
to  trade  unions.     Finds  evidence  that  "our  judges  [English]  are 
now  seeking  to  set  limits  to  the  combination  of  labor." 

1906.     Gompers,  Samuel.     The  injunction  in  labor  disputes  must  go. 
American  federationist,  Apr.,  1906,  v.  13:  228-230. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 

1906.     Furuseth,  Andrew.     No  property  rights  in  man:  the  essen- 
tial   principle    of    protest    against    injunctions    in    labor 
disputes. 
American  federationist.  May,  1906,  v.  13:  310-316. 

HD8065.A6A2,v.l3 

"Argument  before  Judiciary  committee  on  anti-injuiKtion  bill, 
Mar.  14,  1906." 


46  LIBRAKY   OF   CONGRESS 

1906.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Labor  legislation  here  and  in  England. 
[Editoriall. 
American  federationist,  May,  1906,  v.  13:  320-S22. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 

1906.     Gompers,  Samuel.     A  letter  to  President  Roosevelt. 
American  federationist,  June,  1906,  v.  13:  377-380. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 

In  support  of  the  Pearre  anti-injunction  bill  (II.  R.  18752). 

1906.     Joel,  J.  Edmondson,     Trade  disputes  and  the  law  of  molesta- 
tion, and  conspiracy. 
Westminster  review,- June,  1906,  v.  165:  605-615. 

AP4.W5,v.l65 

1906.     Gompers,    Samuel.      Injunction    extended.      Where    next? 
[Editorial!. 
American  federationist,  July,  1906,  v.  13:  J^67-469. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 

1906.     Die  Rechtsprechung  gegeniiber  den  gewerkschaftlichen  Boy- 
kottkampfen  und  Verrufserklarungen. 
Soziale  Praxis,  Aug.  23,  1906,  v..l5:  1221-1223.     H5.S7,v.l5 

1906.     Gompers,  Samuel.     A  fair  injunction  decision — labor  aims  to 
make  it  the  law  of  the  land.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Oct.,  1906,  v.  13:  816-818. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 

1906.     Edwards,  Clement.     The  government  trade  disputes  bill. 

Nineteenth  century  and  after,  Oct.,  1906,  v.  60:  587 -59 If.. 

AP4.N7,v.60 
Criticises  the  clause  of  the  bill  entitled  "Prohibition  of  actions  of 
tort  against  trade  unions."  Argues  that  injunctions  should  be 
prohibited. 
"The  injunction  is  used  early  in  the  fray.  In  a  properly  laid  case 
upon  a  carefully  drawn  series  of  affidavits  a  union  may  find  itself 
prohibited  by  injunction  from  providing  the  sinews  of  war  to  carry 
on  a  strike  perfectly  lawful  in  itself,  but  in  connection  with  which 
certain  unlawful  acts  may  have  been  committed  by  individuals, 
over  whom  they  have  no  control.  An  injunction  under  such  cir- 
cumstances may  cause  the  collapse  of  a  strike,  with  the  result  that 
the  men,  angry  at  such  a  collapse,  will  leave  the  union  in  large 
numbers.  This  has  been  the  experience  in  American  strikes  over 
and  over  again.  There  the  injunction  in  a  strike  has  been  devel- 
oped as  a  weapon  of  great  art  and  power.  And  unless  it  is  pro- 
hibited against  the  unions  here,  it  needs  no  wisdom  to  predict  that 
its  far-reaching  possibilities  will  be  exploited  to  the  utmost  under 
the  pressure  of  the  feelings  engendered  by,  and  the  great  interests 
often  involved  in,  our  great  industrial  conflicts." 


BOYCOTTS  AND  INJUNCTIONS:   PERIODICALS  47 

1906.     Freund,  Ernst.     On  the  legality  of  a  boycott  in  Germany. 
Journal  of  'political  economy,  Nov.,  1906,  v.  14:  573-574. 

HBl.J7,v.l4 

1906.  Grant,  Luke.     Effects  of  labor  injunctions. 

Times  magazine,  Bee,  1906,  v.  1:  68-72.  AP2.T48,v.l 

1907.  Gompers,  Samuel.     Judicial  perversion  of  law  against  labor. 

[Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Jan.,  1907,  v.  14-'  36-38. 

A  discussion  of  certain  court  decisions  in  wliicli  sympathetic  strikes 
were  held  to  l)e  boycotts.  HD8055.A5A2,v.l4 

1907.     Littleiield,  Charles  E.     Most  revolutionary  of  all  class  labor 
propositions,  and  the  hottest  of  all  campaigns  over  it. 
American  industries,  Jan.  1,  1907,  v.  5:  1-4- 

HD4802.A6,v.6 

1907.     Allen,  Andrew  J.     Anti-injunction  legislation. 

Open  shop,  Mar.,  1907,  v.  6:  140-144-  HD6500.O5,v.6 

1907.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Congressional  juggling  and  sophistry  with 
the  injunction  issue.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Apr.,  1907,  v.  14-'  256-258. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l4 

1907.     McWilhams,   Robert  L.     Evolution  of  the  law  relating  to 
boycotts. 
American  law  review,  May-June,  1907,  v.  41'  336-342. 
National  corporation  reporter,  Nov.  28,  1907,  v.  35:  4^0-491. 

1907.     Labor    htigation — strikes    and    boycotts — right    to    a    "free 
market." 
American  law  review,  May-June,  1907,  v.  4i'  44'^~4^1- 

1907.     Spelhng,  T.  C.     "The  point"  in  injunctions.     Al)uso  of  the 
injunction  process  in  its  application  to  personal  as  well  as 
to  property  rights. 
American  federationist,  June,  1907,  v.  14-  4^^-4'^^- 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l4 

1907.     Huebncr,  Grover  G.     Definitions,  laws  and  judicial  decisions 
regarding  boycotting. 
Government,  June,  1907,  v.  1:  36-47.  Hi.G7,v.l 

1907.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Van  Cleave  seeks  injunction  against  A.  F. 
of  L.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Oct.,  1907,  v.  14-'  784-785. 

Case  of  the  boycott  against  the  Buck's  etove  and  raiiLr--  coniiiniiy  of 
St.  Louis.  HD8055.A6A2,v.l4 

67382°— 11 4 


48  LIBRAEY    OF    CONGRESS 

1907.     Gompers,    Samuel.     Taft,    the    injunction    standard-bearer. 
[Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Oct.,  1907.  v.  14-'  785-790. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l4 

1907.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Federal  injunctions  jolted — labor's  con- 
tention justified.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Oct.,  1907,  v.  14-'  790-791. 

Comment  on  the  use  of  the  injunction  by  federal  courts  in  railroad 
rate  cases  in  certain  southern  states.  HD8055.A5A2,v.l4 

1907.     Van  Cleave,  James  W.     The  boycott  and  the  blacklist. 
American  industries,  Oct.  15,  1907,  v.  6:  12-14- 

HD4802.A6,v.6 

1907.     Gompers,   Samuel.     Taft,   the   injunction   candidate.     [Edi- 
torial]. 
American  federationist,  Nov.,  1907,  v.  14'-  872-875. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l4 

1907.      Gompers,  Samuel.    Is  the  boycott  un-American  ?    [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Nov.,  1907,  v.  14-'  875-880. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l4 

1907.     Labor's  attitude  toward  the  writ  of  injunction. 

Charities  and  The  Commons,  Nov.  2,  1907,  v.  19:  1016. 

HVl.C4,v.l9 

1907.     The  boycott  by  labor  declared  illegal:  Justice  Gould's  decision 
summarized. 
American  industries,  Dec.  15,  1907,  v.  6:  22-23. 

HD4802.A6,v.6 

1907.  Seager,  Henry  R.     The  legal  status  of  trade  unions  in  the 

United    Kingdom,    with    conclusions    applicable    to    the 
United  States. 
Political  science  quarterly,  Dec,  1907,  v.  22:  611-629. 

HlP8,v.22 

1908.  Justice  Gould's  decision  on  the  boycott. 

Albany  law  journal,  Jan.,  1908,  v.  70:  8-13. 

1908.     Justice  Gould's  decision  on  the  boycott. 

American  industries,  Jan.  1,  1908,  v.  6:  5-9. 

Text  in  full.  HD4802.A6,v.6 

1908.     Labor's  responsibility  in  the  boycott. 

American  industries,  Jan.  15,  1908,  v.  6:  5-6. 

HD4802.  A6,v.  6 


BOYCOTTS   AND   INJUNCTIONS:   PERIODICALS  49 

1908.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Free  press  and  free  speech  invaded  by 
injunction  against  the  A.  F.  of  L.— a  review  and  protest 
[Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Feb.,  1908,  v.  15:  98-105, 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 

1908.     Gould,  Ashley  M.     Order  granting  injunction.     Buck's  stove 
and  range  co.  vs.  American  federation  of  labor, 
American  federationist,  Feb.,  1908,  v.  15:  114-115. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 

1908.     Injunction  in  labor  cases:    from  an  argument  by  James  M. 
Beck  before  the  Senate  Judiciary  committee. 
American  industries,  Feb.  15, 1908,  v.  7:  20.     HD4802.A6,v.7 

1908.     Kennedy,  John  C.     An  important  labor  injunction. 

Journal  of  political  economy,  Feb.,  1908,  v.  16:  102-105. 

HBl.J7,v.l6 

Decision  of  Judge  Gould,  enjoining  the  American  federation  of  labor 
from  further  boycotting  the  Buck's  stove  and  range  company,  of 
St.  Louis. 

1908.     Darling,  Charles  R.     Recent  American  decisions  and  English 
legislation  affecting  labor  unions. 
American  law  review,  Mar.-Apr.,  1908,  v.  J^2:  200-228. 

1908.     Supreme  court  decision  in  the  hatters'  case.     Affects  all  or- 
ganized labor — a  symposium  giving  opinion  and  comment 
by  men  of  affairs. 
American  federationist,  Mar.,  1908,  v.  15:  161-178. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 

1908.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Labor  organizations  must  not   be  out- 
lawed— the  Supreme  court's  decision  in  the  hatters'  case. 
[Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Mar.,  1908,  v.  15:  180-192. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 

1908.     Supreme  court  decision.     Dietrich   Loewe  et  al.  vs.  Martin 
Lawlor  et  al.     Feb.  3,  1908. 
American  federationist,  Mar.,  1908,  v.  15:  195-199. 

Text  of  the  decision.  HD8055.A6A2,v.l6 

1908.     Injunctions.     By  a  member  of  the  New  Jersey  bar. 

Exponent,  St.  Louis,  Mar.,  1908,  v.  5:  13-14-     HD6500.E8,v.5 
"A  clear  analysis  of  the  principles  of  injunction  law." 


60  LIBRAEY    OF    CONGRESS 

1908.     The  boycott  perpetually  enjoined.     Justice  Clabaugh's  deci- 
sion. 
American  industries,  Apr.  1,  1908,  v.  7:  17. 

Text  of  the  decision.  HD4802.A6,v.7 

1908.     Littlefield,  Charles  E.     "Class  legislation." 

Exponent,  St.  Louis,  Apr.,  1908,  v.  5:  6-9,  15. 

HD6500.E8,v.5 

A  discussion  chiefly  of  the  subject  of  injunctions  in  labor  disputes. 

1908.     Amend    the    Sherman    anti-trust    law — labor    must  exercise 
its  political  power.     A  symposium  by  men  of  affairs. 
American  fed  erationist,  May,  1908,  v.  15:  35Jf.~36Jf.. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 

1908.     Gompers,  Samuel.    Labor  and  the  anti-trust  law.    [Editorial]. 
American federationist,  May,  1908,  v.  15:  366-388. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 

1908.     Speer,  AVilliam  H.     Anti-injunction  legislation. 
American  industries,  Junel,  1908,  v.  7:  12-13. 

HD4802.A6,v.7 

1908.     Leipart,     Theodor.      Der     Boykott    als    gewerkschaftliches 
Kampfmittel. 
SozialistiscJie  MonatsTiefte ,  June,  1908,  v.  14-'  7 2 4-7 29. 

HX6.S6,v.l4 

1908.     Mahon,  John.     Labor  and  the  judiciary. 

American  law  review,  July-Aug.,  1908,  v.  4^'  598-601. 

1908.     Silverstein,  David.     Injunctions  in  labor  cases. 

American  federationist,  July,  1908,  v.  15:  517-519. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 

1908.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Judge  upholds  labor's  injunction  conten- 
tion.    [Editorial]. 

American  federationist,  July,  1908,  v.  15:  529-531. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 

1908.     Amendment  to  Sherman  law.    Argument  presented  by  Presi- 
dent Samuel  Gompers,  of  the  A.  F.  of  L.,  before  Judiciary 
committee  of  the  House,  April  6,   1908,   on  amendment 
to  the  Sherman  anti-trust  law. 
American  federationist,  July,  1908,  v.  15:  538-541- 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 

1908.     Mine  workers  on  injunctions. 

American  federationist,  July,  1908,  v.  15:  54^-543. 

Resolutions  adopted  by  United  mine  workers  of  America. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 


BOYCOTTS  AND  INJUNCTIONS:   PERIODICALS  51 

1908.     Littlefield,  Charles  E.     The  President  and  the  courts. 
American  industries,  July  1, 1908,  v.  7:  11-1 4. 

HD4802.A6,v.7 

1908.     Emery,  James  A.     The  truth  about  injunctions. 

American  industries,  July  15,  1908,  v.  7:  25-26. 

HD4802.A6,v.7 

"A  review  of  the  records  bearing  on  the  question  of  alleged  abuses 
of  the  power  of  injunction." 

1908.     Gompers,    Samuel.     Both  parties    have  spoken — choose  be- 
tween them.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Aug.,  1908,  v.  15:  598-606. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 
On  the  injunction  planks  in  the  platforms  of  the  Republican  and 
Democratic  parties. 

1908.     Gompers,  Samuel.      The   essence    of    labor's   contention  on 
injunctions.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Aug.,  1908,  v.  15:  611-613. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 

1908,     Burdick,  Francis  M.     Injunctions  in  labor  disputes. 

North  American  review,  Aug.,  1908,  v.  188:  273-284.  V 

AP2.N7,v.l88 
1908.     Concerning  injunctions. 

OutlooJc,  Aug.  8,  1908,  v.  89:  786-789.  ap2.08,v.89 

1908.     Dwight,  Frederick.     The  origin  and  use  of  injunctions. 

Independent,  Aug.  13,  1908,  v.  65:  348-351.        ap2.I53,v.65 

1908.     Trieber,  Jacob.     Injunctions  and  the  judiciary. 

Independent,  Aug.  13,  1908,  v.  65:  352-354-         AP2.l53,v.65 

1908.     Gompers,  Samuel.     The  abuse  of  injunctions. 

Independent,  Aug.  27,  1908,  v.  65:  460-463.         AP2.l53,v.65 

1908.     Trickett,  W.     The  rationale  of  the  injunction. 

American  law  review,  Sept.-Oct.,  1908,  v.  42:  687-705. 

1908.     Brown,   Arthur  March.     Labor   ([uestions   in   the   courts  of 
Massachusetts. 
American  law  review,  Sept.-Od.,  1908,  v.  42-  706-734- 

1908.  Petition  of  Buck's  stove  and  range  co.  to  the  Supreme  court 
of  the  District  of  Columbia  for  an  order  against  Samuel 
Gompers,  Frank  Morrison,  and  John  Mitcholl.  "to  show 
cause  "  why  they  should  not  be  punished  for  the  court's  in- 
junction of  Dec.  18,  1907. 
American  federationist,  Sept.,  1908,  v.  15:  674,  ^^*^«'>'.  0^^'^,  682, 
684,  686,  688,  690,  692.  hd8055.A5A2,v.15 


52  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

1908.     Gompers,  Samuel.     The  cry  for  more  (in)equity. 

American  federationist,  SejJt.,  1908,  v.  15:  llfi-lI^S. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 
1908.     Alger,  George  W.     Taft  and  labor. 

McClures  magazine,  Sept.,  1908,  v.  31:  597-602. 

AP2.M2,v.31 

1908.     \\Tiite,  Henry.     The  labor  unions  in  the  presidential  cam- 
paign. 
North  American  review,  Sept.,  1908,  v.  188:  372-382. 

AP2.N7,v.l88 

1908.     Groat,  George  Gorham.     The  courts'  view  of  injunction  in 
labor  disputes. 
Political  science  quarterly,  Sept.,  1908,  v.  23:  Jf.08-J^39. 

Hl.P8,v.23 

1908.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Injunction  contempt  proceedings. 
American Jederationist,  Oct.,  1908,  v.  15:  852-858. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 

1908.     Low,  Seth.     The  writ  of  injunction  as  a  party  issue.     A  com- 
parison of  the  Republican  and  Democratic  platforms  in 
their  treatment  of  the  labor  question. 
Century  magazine,  Oct.,  1908,  v.  76:  911-916.       ap2.C4,v.76 

1908.     Chandler,  William  E.     The  labor  union,  the  injunction,  and 

the  trust. 
Collier  s,  Oct.  10,  1908,  v.  4^:  21^.  AP2.C65,v.42 

1908.     Hendrick,  Burton  J.     The  battle  against  the  Sherman  law. 
How  capital  and  labor  combine  to  safeguard  the  trust  and 
legalize  the  boycott. 
McGlure's  magazine,  Oct.,  1908,  v.  31:  665-680. 

AP2.M2,v.31 
1908.     Hourwich,  Isaac  A.     Injunctions. 

Moody's  magazine,  Oct.,  1908,  v.  6:  270-273.       hgi.M85,v.6 

1908.     Lewis,  Henry  Harrison.     The  peril  of  anti-injunction  legisla- 
tion. 
North  American  review,  Oct.,  1908,  v.  188:  577-583. 

AP2.N7,v.188 
1908.     Baldwin,  E.  F.     Government  by  injunction. 

American  Jederationist,  Nov.,  1908,  v.  15:  953-955. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 

1908.     Gompers,   Samuel.     President   Roosevelt's   attack  on  labor 
answered.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Nov.,  1908,  v.  15:  973-980. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 


BOYCOTTS   AND   INJUNCTIONS:    PERIODICALS  53 

1908.     Stevens,  Frederick  W.     Proper  use  of  the  writ  of  injunction — 
^  from  the  standpoint  of  legal  history. 

Columbia  law  review,  Nov.,  1908,  v.  8:  561-566. 

Reprinted  in  Virginia  law  register,  Dec,  1908,  v.  14,  pp.  577-583; 
and  in  New  Jersey  law  journal,  Dec,  1908,  v.  31,  pp.  357-359. 

1908.     Turner,  George  Kibbe.     What  organized  labor  wants.     An 
interview  with  Samuel  Gompers. 
McClures  magazine,  Nov.,  1908,  v.  32:  25-31.    aP2.M2,v.32 
Reprinted  in  part  in  American  federationist,  Dec,  1908,  v.  15,  pp. 
1057-1063.  HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 

A  statement  of  Mr.  Gompers'  position  in  regard  to  injunctions,  boy- 
cotts, etc. 

1908.  Wissell,  Rudolf.     Schadenersatzanspriiche  aus  Boykott  und 

Sperren. 
Neue  Zeit,  Dec.  11,  18,  1908,  v.  27:  4O6-413,  437-443. 

HX6.N6,v.27 

1909.  Judge  [Alton  B.]  Parker's  argument.     In  connection  with  the 

Buck's  stove  and  range  company's  contempt  proceedings. 
American  Jederationist,  Jan.,  1909,  v.  16:  17-30. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 

1909.     Gompers,  Samuel.     President  Roosevelt's  message  on  labor. 
[Editorial]. 
American  jederationist,  Jan.,  1909,  v.  16:  4^~4'^ • 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 
Relates  principally  to  the  President's  attitude  on  the  injunction 
question. 

1909.     The  contempt  decision  of  Justice  Wright. 

American  industries,  Jan.  1,  1909,  v.  8:  8-18. 

HD4802.A6,v.8 

Text  of  the  decision  in  the  case  of  Buck's  stove  and  range  company 
vs.  American  federation  of  labor. 

1909.     History  of  the  Buck's  stove  and  range  company  boycott  case. 
American  industries,  Jan.  1,  1909,  v.  8:  23-33. 

HD4802.A6,v.8 

1909.     Taylor,  Graham.     From  the  judges  to  the  law  makers. 

Charities  and  The  Commons,  Jan.  16,  1909,  v.  21:  693-694. 

HVl.C4,v.21 

1909.     Cook,  E.  Wake.     King  Boycott:  a  new  potentate. 

East  and  West,  Jan.,  1909,  v.  8:  53-56.  AP8.E2,v.8 

1909.     Portenar,  A.  J.     Nemo  me  impune  lacessit. 

Independent,  Jan.  28,  1909,  v.  66:  182-185.        AP2.I63,v.66 


54  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

1909.     Injunction  law:  boycotts:  labor  unions. 

National  corporation  reporter,  Jan.  21,  28,  1909,  v.  37:  710- 
715,  746-750. 

"The  Buck  stove  and  range  co.  v.  The  American  federation  of 
labor,  et  al." 

1909.     The  conviction  of  labor  leaders:  the  principles  involved. 

Outloolc,  Jan.  2,  1909,  v.  91:  3-6.  AP2.08,v.91 

1909.     Justice  Wright's  decision. 

American  federationist,  Feb.,  1909,  v.  16:  101-128. 

HD8055.A5.A2,v.l6 

In  the  case  of  the  Buck's  stove  and  range  company  vs.  the  American 
federation  of  labor,  et  al. 

1909.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Justice  Wright's  denial  of  free  speech  and 
free  press.     [Editorial]. 
American  jederationist,  Feb.,  1909,  v.  16:  130-132. 

HD8055.A5.A2,v.l6 
1909.     Famous  boycott  case. 

American  review  oj  reviews,  Feb.,  1909,  v.  39:  145-146. 

AP2.Il4,v.39 

1909.     The  "unfair  list"  and  the  freedom  of  the  press. 
Chicago  legal  news,  Feb.  20,  1909,  v.  4I:  233. 

1909.     The  contempt  of  Samuel  Gompers;  labor  unions  ablaze;  the 
boycott  and  the  blacklist. 
Current  literature,  Feb.,  1909,  v.  46:  127-132.       ap2.C95,v.46 

1909.     Speer,  William  H.     Recent  labor  decisions. 

Exponent,  St.  Louis,  Feb.,  1909,  v.  6:  6-8.        HD6500.E8,v.6 
An  address  delivered  before  the  Citizens'  industrial  association  of 
St.  Louis,  Jan.  19,  1909. 

1909.     Hale,  Richard  W.     Injunctions  and  pardons.     7w  re  Gompers. 

American  law  review,  Mar. -Apr.,  1909,  v.  43:  192-204- 

1909.     Gompers,  Samuel.     [Editorial  comment  on  Justice  Wright's 
decision]. 
American  federationist,  Mar.,  1909,  v.  16:  216-229. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 

1909.     Right  to  restrain  the  right  of  free  speech  or  a  free  press  when 
necessary  to  make  effective  the  terms  of  an  injunction 
restraining  a  boycott. 
Central  law  journal,  Mar.  19,  1909,  v.  68:  207-208. 


BOYCOTTS  AND  INJUNCTIONS:   PERIODICALS  55 

1909.     Martin,  John.     Labor  unions  and  the  boycott. 

Charities  and  The  Commons,  Mar.  6,  1909,  v.  21:  IO46-IO48. 

HVl.C4,v.21 

1909.     Schaffner,  Margaret  A.     Injunctions  in  labor  disputes. 

Charities  and  The  Commons,  Mar.  21,  1909,  v.  21:  1236. 

HVl.C4,v.21 

1909.     Court  of  appeals  of  the  District  of  Columbia.     No.  1916.     De- 
cided Mar.  11,  1909.     The  American  federation  of  labor 
et  al.,  appellants,  v.  the    Buck's  stove   and  range  com- 
pany. 
Chicago  legal  news,  Mar.  20,  1909,  v.  4I:  265-268,  270-272. 
Text  of  court  decision. 

1909.     Thomas,  David  Y.     A  year  of  bench  labor  law. 

Political  science  quarterly,  Mar.,  1909,  v.  24.:  80-94- 

Hl.P8,v.24 

1909.     Court  of  appeals  of  the  District  of  Columbia,     The  American 
federation  of  labor  et  al.,  appellants,  v.  the  Buck's  stove 
and  range  company.     Decided  March  11,  1909. 
American  federationist,  Apr.,  1909,  v.  16:  313-335. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 

1909.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Buck's  stove  and  range  company  injunc- 
tion modified.     [Editoriall. 
American  federationist,  Apr.,  1909,  v.  16:  336-345. 

HD8065.A5A2,v.l6 

1909.     MacDonald,  Edward  A.     The  right  of  a  trade  union  to  enforce 
a  boycott. 
Michigan  law  review,  Apr.,  1909,  v.  7:  4^9-502. 

1909.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Justice  Wright's  decision  and  sentence  in 
the  Gompers,  Mitchell,  and  Morrison  case.     [Editorial]. 
The  appeal  and  Judge  Parker's  magnificent  argument. 
American  federationist,  May,  1909,  v.  16:  4'^^-4-''>^- 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 

Includes  extended  extracts  from  the  argument  of  the  attorney  for 
the  defendants. 

1909.     Abridging  freedom  of  speech  or  of  press  by  injunction. 
Law  notes,  May,  1909,  v.  13:  21-22. 

1909.     Is  the  "black  list"  unlawful? 

Law  notes,  May,  1909,  v.  13:  22-23. 

1909.     Stote,  Amos.     What  boycotts  cost  the  nation. 

Moody's  magazine.  May,  1909,  v.  7:  370-373.     hgi.M85,v.7 


56  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

1909.     Veeder,   Van  Vechten.     Absolute  immunity  in  defamation: 
judicial  proceedings. 
Columbia  law  review,  June,  1909,  v.  9:  4^3-491. 

1909.     Taft,    William    Howard.     Judicial  decisions   as   an  issue  in 
politics. 
McCIure's  magazine,  June,  1909,  v.  33:  201-209. 

AP2.M2,v.33 
1909.     Bope,  George  W.     Wrongs  to  be  righted. 

American  federationist,  July,  1909,  v.  16:  593-596. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 
Chiefly  on  the  question  of  injunctions  in  labor  disputes . 

1909.     Lennon,  John  B.     Unjust  injunctions  work  for  personal  free- 
dom.    [Editoriall. 
American  federationist,  Aug.,  1909,  v.  16:  671-672. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 

1909.     Fauntleroy,  Cornelius  H.     Government  by  injunction. 
Central  law  journal,  Aug.  20,  1909,  v.  69:  129-135. 

1909.     Drew,  Walter.     A  legal  discussion  of  the  boycott. 

Square  deal,  Sept.,  1909,  v.  5:  100-108.  HD6500.S7,v.5 

1909.     Kirby,  John,  jr.     Where  does  President  Taft  stand  ? 
American  industries,  Oct.,  1909,  v.  10:  10-12. 

HD4802.A6,v.lO 

A  criticism  of  the  President's  speech  delivered  at  Chicago,  Sept. 
16,  1909,  discussing  labor  unions,  the  question  of  injunctions,  etc. 

1909.     Enjoining  argument  by  persuasion  to  induce  one  to  join  a 
labor  union. 
Central  law  journal,  Oct.  29,  1909,  v.  69:  315-316. 

1909.     The  boycott  and  free  speech. 

Outloolc,  Nov.  13,  20,  1909,  v.  93:  562,  607-608. 

AP2.08,v.93 

1909.     Court  of  appeals  of  the  District  of  Columbia.     Samuel  Gom- 
pers,  Frank  Morrison,  and  John  Mitchell,  appellants,  v. 
the  Buck's  stove  and  range  company,  appellee.     No.  1990. 
Decided  Nov.  2,  1909. 
American  federationist,  Dec,  1909,  v.  16:  1037-1059. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 
Text  of  the  decision  of  the  court. 

^  1909.     Boyle,  James.     Organized  labor  and  court  decisions. 

Forum,  Dec,  1909,  v.  1^.2:  535-551.  AP2.F8,v.42 


BOYCOTTS  AND   INJUNCTIONS:    PERIODICALS  57 

1909.  The  Gompers-Mitchell-Morrison  sentence  affirmed.     Court  of 

appeals  of  the  District  of  Cohimbia.     Samuel  Gompers, 
Frank  Morrison,  and  John   Mitchell,  ai)pellants,  v.   the 
Buck's  stove  and  range  company,  appellee. 
Square  deal,  Dec,  1909,  v.  5:  389-434.  HD6500.S7,v.5 

Text  of  the  decision. 

1910.  Our  test  case  in  the  U.  S.  Supreme  court.     Petition  and  brief 

[in  the  case  of  the  Buck's  stove  and  range  company]. 
American  federationist,  Jan.,  1910,  v.  17:  17-32. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 

1910.     Gompers,  Samuel.     The  President  on  injunctions.    [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Jan.,  1910,  v.  17:  4-^-48- 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 

Comment  on  the  President's  annual  message  to  Congress. 

1910.     Bettman,  Gilbert.     Contempt  procedure  in  equity. 
American  federationist,  Feb.,  1910,  v.  17:  116-118. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 

1910.     Primm,  C.  J.     Labor  unions  and  the  anti-trust  law:  a  review, 
of  decisions. 
Journal  of  political  economy,  Feb.,  1910,  v.  18:  129-1S8. 

HBl.J7,v.l8 

1910.     Illegal  boycott :  the  Danbury  hatters. 

Outlool,  Feb.  19,  1910,  v.  94:  370-371.  AP2.08,v.94 

1910.     Union  rule  or  ruin.     Story  of  the  Danbury  boycott  as  told  in 
court. 
Square  deal,  Feb.,  1910,  v.  6:  38-48.  hd6500.S7,v.6 

From  the  New  York  Sun. 

1910.     Gompers,  Samuel.     The  hatters'  case.     The  Sherman  law — 
amend  it  or  end  it. 
American  federationist,  Mar.  1910,  v.  17:  197-204- 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 

1910.     Bennett,  A.  W.     Unions  may  boycott;  so  tlio  court  docick'^s 
in  the  case  of  the  first  injunction  in  a  labor  dispute  in  the 
new  state  of  Oklahoma. 
American  federationist.  Mar.,  1910,  v.  17:  228-230. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 

1910.     Emery,  James  A.     The  administration  injunction  bill. 
American  industries,  Mar.,  1910,  i\  10:  28-29. 

HD4802.A6,v.l0 


58  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

1910.     Merritt,   Walter  Gordon.     The    significance    of    the  Loewe 
decision. 
American  industries,  1910,  Mar.,  v.  10:  22-23;  Apr.,  v.  10: 
25-27;  May,  v.  10:  28-29,  46.  hd4802.A6,v.10 

Reprinted  in  Square  deal,  Apr.-June,  1910,  v.  6,  pp.  227-231,  353- 
359,  433-437. 

1910.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Judicial  invasion  of  guaranteed  rights.  . 
American  federationist,  Apr.,  1910,  v.  17:  297-301. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 

1910.     Gompers,  Samuel.     A  protest  against  legaUzing  the  injunc- 
tion abuse. 
American  federationist,  Apr.,  1910,  v.  17:  318-320. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 

1910.     Civic  federation  on  black  and  white  lists. 

Survey,  Apr.  10,  1910,  v.  22:  88-89.  HVl.C4,v.23 

1910.     Caldwell,  Henry  Clay.     Trial  by  judge  and  jury. 

American  federationist,  May,  1910,  v.  17:  385-399. 

HD8056.A5A2,v.l7 

1910.     Bottger,  Hugo.     Der  Boykott. 

Preussische  JaJirhuclier,  June,  1910,  v.  I4O:  444~4^^- 

AP30.P8,v.l40 

1910.     Emery,  James  A.     Injunctions  practically  considered. 

Square  deal,  June,  1910,  v.  6:  385-394-  HD6500.S7,v.6 

Reprinted  from  Annals  of  the  American  academy  of  political  and 
social  science,  v.  36,  no.  1. 

1910.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Injunctions:  human  rights  and  property 
rights  confused.     [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  July,  1910,  v.  17:  590-593. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 

1910.     The  Buck's  stove  and  range  case.     The  proof  of  conspiracy  as 
given  in  Justice  Wright's  decision  (no.  27305,  equity,  Dis- 
trict of  Columbia,  Dec.  23,  1908.) 
American  industries,  Aug.,  1910,  v.  11:  5-8. 

HD4802.A6,v.ll 
Reprinted  in  Square  deal,  Sept.,  1910,  v.  7,  pp.  108-llG. 

1910.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Free  speech  and  the  injunction  order. 

American  academy  of  political  and  social  science.     Annals, 
Sept.,  1910,  V.  36:  255-264.  Hi.A4,v.36 

1910.     Merritt,  Walter  G.     Law  of  the  Danbury  hatters'  case. 

American  academy  of  political  and  social  science.     Annals, 
Sept.,  1910,  V.  36:  265-276.  Hl.A4,v.36 


BOYCOTTS   AND   INJUNCTIONS  :    PERIODICALS  59 

1910.     SchafFner,   Margaret   A.     Effect   of  the   recent   boycott   de- 
cisions. 
American  academy  of  political  and  social  science.     Annals, 
Sept.,  1910,  V.  36:  277-287.  Hl.A4,v.36 

1910.     Bryan,  James  Wallace.     Proper  bounds  of  the  use  of  the 
injunction  in  labor  disputes. 
American  academy  of  political  and  social  science.     Annals, 
Sept.,  1910,  V.  86:  288-301.  Hl.A4,v.36 

1910.     Gompers,  Samuel.     Buck's  stove  and  range  company's  agree- 
ment with  organized  labor.     [Editorial]. 

American  federationist,  Sept.,  1910,  v.  17:  S07-S12. 

HD8065.A5A2,v.l7 

1910.     Origin  of  the  ^vTit  of  injunction.     Terrester. 

Central  law  journal,  Sept.  9,  1910,  v.  71:  168-172. 

1910.     Use  and  abuse  of  injunctions. 

Outlook,  Sept.,  3,  1910,  v.  96:  1^-17.  AP2.08,v.96 

1910.     Frazier,  Walter  S.     Injunctions. 

Outlook,  Oct.  1,  1910,  V.  96:  288-289.  AP2.08,v.96 

1910.     Shepard,  Almond  G.     Principles  applicable  in  determining 

the  lawfulness  of  a  boycott  by  a  labor  union. 

American  federationist,  Nov.,  1910,  v.  17:  976-981. 

HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 

1910.     Interference    by    combinations    of    labor    with    employer's 
business. 
Columbia  law  review,  Nov.,  1910,  v.  10:  652-654. 

1910.  The  secondary  boycott.     [Editorial]. 

Outlook,  Nov.  26,  1910,  v.  96:  661.  AP2.08,v.96 

1911.  Gompers,  Samuel.     A  specimen  of  wobbly  thinking. 

American  federationist,  Jan.  1911,  v.  IS:  29-31. 

Reply  to  an  editorial  in  the  Outlook,  for  Nov.  26, 1910,  entitled  "The 
secondary  boycott."  HD8055.A5A2,v.l8 

1911.     Gompers,  Samuel.     The  President's  habit  of  mind  on  injunc- 
tions.    [Editorial]. 
American  federationist,  Jan.,  1911,  v.  18:  32-34- 

HD8055.A6A2,v.l8 


■J 


ADDITIONAL  REFERENCES 

Becker,  Tracy  C.     Boycotting :  is  it  criminal  ? 

{In  New  York  state  bar  association.  Reports,  1887,  v.  10,  pp.  148 
and  following.     Albany,  1887.     8°.) 

Debs,  Eugene  Victor.     Debs :  his  life,  writings  and  speeches,  with  a 

department  of  appreciations. 

Girard,    Kan.:  The  Appeal  to  reason,   1908.     (4),   n,    {2), 

515  pp.    Frontispiece.    Illustrated.    Plates.    Portraits.    8°. 

"Life  of  Eugene  V.  Debs,  by  Stephen  Marion  Reynolds":  p.  1-76; 

"The  federal  government  and  the  Chicago  strike":  pp.  181-205; 

"Growth  of  the  injunction":  pp.  313-318. 

8—28429 

Devine,  Thomas  H.     Government  by  injunction. 

(/«.  Colorado  bar  association.     Report,  1905,  pp.  187-204.     [Denver, 
1905].     8°.) 
Littlefield,  Charles  E.     The  Sherman  anti-trust  law  and  the  proposed 
amendments  thereto. 

(In  Illinois  state  bar  association.     Proceedings,  32d  annual  meeting, 

1908,  pp.  23-65.     Springfield,  1908.     8°.) 
Also  printed  in  Chicago  legal  news,  July  4,  1908,  v.  40,  pp.  373-376, 

378-379. 

Massachusetts.     Committee  on  relations  hetween  employer  and  em- 
ployee.    Report.     Submitted  in  accordance  with  resolve 
approved  June  5,  1903. 
Boston:    Wright   &  Potter  printing  co.,  state  printers,  1904. 
118  pp.     8°. 

"Blacklisting;  intimidation;  boycotts;  injunction  in  labor  disputes": 
pp.  56-72. 

Appendix  no.  11.  Liability  in  case  of  a  boycott:  pp.  103-104;  App. 
no.  12.  Correspondence  concerning  injunctions  in  Massachusetts: 
pp.  104-107;  App.  no.  13.  An  act  to  give  trial  by  jury  and  appeal 
in  certain  cases  of  contempt  of  court:  pp.  107-109;  App.  no.  15. 
Judicial  opinions  on  industrial  disputes. 

HD8053.M4A6  1904 

n— 1817 

Stern,  Samuel  R.     The  law  and  the  laborer. 

{In  Washington  state  bar  association.  Proceedings,  1894,  pp. 
107-129.     [n.  p.],  1894.     8°.) 

Stoll,  R.  C.     Power  to  enjoin  organized  interference  with  property. 

{In  Kentucky  bar  association.  Proceedings,  1907,  pp.  196-226. 
Louisville,  [1907].     8°.) 

Swayne,   Wager.     The  legal  aspect  of  railroad  strikes — the  Ann 
Arbor  decision. 

{In  Compendium  of  transportation  theories,  pp.  121-128.  Washing- 
ton, 1893.     8°.) 

HE1031.C73 

Temple,  M.  L.     How  far  are  labor  unions  liable  for  the  acts  of  their 
members. 

{In    Iowa    state    bar   association.     Proceedings,    1904,    pp.    48-57. 
Tipton, 1904.     8°.) 
60 


ARTICLES  IX  PERIODICALS 

1897.     Greenbaum,  Milton  D.     The  power  of  the  United  States  courts 
to  enjoin  persons  from  obstructing  interstate  commerce 
and  the  transportation  of  the  mails. 
CUcag^egal  news,  1897,  Aug.  28,  Sept.  4,  11,  18,  25,  Oct.  2, 
V.  30r-4-3;  13-14;  ^7;  34;  39-40;  46-47. 

Reprinted  from  the  Baltimore  Daily  record. 
1907.     Smith,  Jeremiah.     Crucial  issues  in  labor  litigation. 

Harvard  law  review,  Feb. -Apr.,  1907,  v.  20:  253-279;  345- 
362;  429-455. 

1907.     Government  by  injunction  in  its  various  aspects.     Repre- 
sentatives of  labor  and  of  capital  discuss  the  conflicting 
issues  of  the  day. 
National  civic  federation  review.  Mar. -Apr.,  1907,  v.  2:  2-4. 
Discussion  by  Aucjust  Belmont,  Seth  Low,  T.  C.  Spelling,  Walter 
Drew,  and  John  Mitchell. 

HD4802.N2,v.2 

1907.     Meier,  W.  F.     The  attitude  of  equity  toward  the  strike  and 
boycott — use  of  the  injunction. 
Law  notes,  May,  1907,  v.  11:  27-31. 

1907.     Conspiracy — labor  unions,     Jetton-Dekle  lumber  co.  v.  Ma- 
ther.    Supreme  court  of  Florida,  Feb.  26,  1907. 
Central  law  journal,  Oct.  4,  1907,  v.  65:  258-261. 

"Labor  unions  as  monopolies  imposing  illegal  restraints  upon  trade 
and  commerce  [editorial  note]":  pp.  261-262. 

1907.  Donnell,  F.    C.     Injunctions    against   strikes,    boycotts    and 

similar  unlawful  acts. 
Central  law  journal,  Oct.  11,  1907,  v.  65:  273-282. 

1908.  Injunctions.     [Editorial.] 

Green  hag,  Jan.,  1908,  v.  20:  34-35. 
1908.     The  anti-trust  act  and  the  boycott.     [Editorial]. 
Legal  intelligencer,  Feb.  7,  1908,  v.  65:  88. 

1908.     Regulation    of    contempt    proceedings    in    injunction    cases. 
C.  C.  M. 

Law  notes.  Mar.,  1908,  v.  11:  225. 
1908.     Boycotting  interstate  commerce. 

Case  and  comment,  Apr.,  1908,  v.  14:  154-155. 

Editorial  comment  on  the  decision  of  the  United  States  vSuprcme 
court  in  the  case  Loewe  v.  Lawler  (28  Supreme  court  rejwrt.s,  301). 

61 


62  .  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

1908.     Shall  the  anti-trust  act  be  amended?     Effort  to  amend  the 

Sherman  act — hearings  before  the  House  Committee  on 

the  judiciary  on  the  Civic  federation's  bill — the  measure 

explained  and  defended. 

National  civic  federation  review,  May,  190S,  v.  3:  1-5,  19-24. 

HD4802.N2,v.3 
1908.     Knowlton,  Jerome  C.     Labor  organizations  in  legislation. 
Michigan  law  review,  June,  1908,  v.  6:  609-623. 

Comment  on  the  decisions  of  the  United  States  Supreme  court  in  the 
cases  Howard  v.  Illinois  Central  railway  (207  U.  S.,  463);  Adair  v. 
United  States  (208  U.  S.,  161);  and  Loewe  v.  Lawlor  (208  U.  S., 
274). 

1908.     Boycott  as  combination  in  restraint  of  trade  under  the  anti- 
trust act.     [Editorial  comment]. 
Yale  law  journal,  June,  1908,  v.  17:  616-618. 

1908.     Stevens,    F,    W.     Judge    Taft's    decisions    affecting    labor 
organizations. 
OUo  law  reporter,  July,  27,  1908,  v.  6:  2^7-262. 

Address  delivered  before  the  Kalamazoo  County  (Mich.)  bar  asso- 
ciation, June  30,  1908. 

1908.     A   comparison   of  the   "injunction   planks"    in   the   present 
party  platforms. 
Bencl  and  bar,  Sept.,  1908,  v.  14:  83-89. 

1908.     Amendment  of  the  anti-trust  act.     Further  hearings  before 
the  House  Committee  on  the  judiciary  on  the  Civic  federa- 
tion's bill — the  argument  of  the  opposition — the  Commis- 
sioner of  corporations  defends  the  general  plan. 
National  civic  federation  review,  Sept.,  1908,  v.  3:  2-4- 

HD4802.N2,v.3 

1908.     Dwight,  F.     The  origin  and  use  of  injunctions. 

New  Jersey  law  journal,  Sept.,  1908,  v.  31:  261-265. 

1908.  Trieber,  Jacob.     Injunctions  and  the  judiciary. 

New  Jersey  law  journal,  Sept.,  1908,  v.  31:  266-269. 

1909.  Littlefield,     Charles    E.     Legislative    invasion    of    judicial 

power. 

Brief  (Phi  delta  phi  quarterly),  Jan.,  1909,  v.  8:  221-247. 

Part  of  a  speech  upon  the  general  subject  of  injunctions,  delivered 
in  the  House  of  Representatives  on  May  30,  1908. 

1909.     Low,  Seth.     The  contempt  cases  of  Messrs.  Gompers,  Mitchell 
and  Morrison. 
National  civic  federation  review,  Mar.,  1909,  v.  3:  13. 

HD4802.N2,v.3 


BOYCOTTS  AND   INJUNCTIONS  :   PERIODICALS  63 

1909.     Amending  the  Sherman  anti-trust  law.     Committee  to  draft 
bill^'ital  interests  involved — President  Low's  views — 
modilications  must  apply  equally  to  labor  and  capital. 
National  civic  federation  review,  Mar.,  1909,  v.  3:  Lj.-!'). 

HD4802.N2,v.3 

1909.  Sweet,  Ada  C.     A  great  plea  for  free  speech  and  a  free  press. 

The  Court  of  appeals  decision  modifying  Justice  Gould's 
injunction  in  the  Gompers-Mitc hell-Morrison  case. 
National  civic  federation  review,  July,  1909,  v.  3:  15,  27. 

HD4802.N2,v.3 

1910.  Labor  unions  and  contempt  proceedings.     [Editorial]. 

Law  notes,  Jan.,  1910,  v.  13:  185. 

1910.     Noble,  Herbert.     The  Sherman  anti-trust  act  and  industrial 
combinations. 
American  law  review,  Mar.-Apr.,  1910,  v.  44-   177-199. 

1910.     Furuseth,  Andrew.     Government  by  injunction — the  misuse 
of  the  equity  powder. 
Central  latv  journal,  July  8,  1910,  v.  71:  5-7. 

1910.     Shepard,  Almond  G.     Boycotts.     Principles  applicable  in  de- 
termining the  lawfulness  of  a  boycott  by  a  labor  union. 
Case  and  comment,  Sept.,  1910,  v.  17:  159-166. 

1910.     Littlefield,  Charles  E.     The  use  and  abuse  of  injunctions  in 
labor  controversies. 
Ca^e  and  comment,  Sept.,  1910,  v.  17:  173-178. 

67382°— 11 5 


INDEX 


rage 

Adams,  Thomas  S 3 

Aiken,  William  P 35 

Alfassa,  Maurice 16 

Alger,  George  W 52 

Allen,  Andrew  J 47 

Allen,  Charles  Claflin 3 

American  academy  of  political  and 

social  science 3, 19,  20 

American  and  English  decisions  in 

equity 3,  4 

American    and    English    encyclo- 
paedia of  law 13,  21 

American  antiboycott  association. .         10 

American  bar  association 3,  23 

American  digest 4 

American  economic  association 11 

American  federation  of  labor 5,  6, 

7,  8, 10,  40,  41,  47, 49,  53,  54,  55,  57 

Ann  Arbor  cases 31,  34,  60 

Ashley,  W.J 45 

Atkins,  Thomas  S 32,  33 

Baldwin,  E.  F 52 

Barker,  Wharton 37 

Bateman,  Warner  M 35 

Bayne,  Howard  R 43 

Beach,  Charles  Fisk 6 

Beck,  James  M 8, 10,  49 

Becker,  Tracy  C 60 

Bell,  Richard 6 

Belmont,  August 61 

Bennett,  A.  W 57 

Benton,  Josiah  Ilonry,  jr 6 

Bettman,  Gilbert 57 

Beveridge,  W.  H 44 

Bibliography 3, 

4,  7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 19,  20,  35,  38 
See  also  Cases,  Tables  of 

Biblioth^que  du  Mus^e  social 16 

Bishoj),  James,  jV '     6 

Blacklisting 9, 10, 

11, 12, 14,  24,  39, 48, 54,  55, 58,  60 

Bliss,  William  D.  P 16 

Bottgor,  Hugo 58 

Bolen,  George  Lewis 6 


Page 

Bope,  George  W 56 

Boulton,  A.  C.  Forster 21 

Boycotting,  definitions  of 47 

Boyle,  James 56 

Brigham,  Clifford 32 

Brown,  Arthur  March 51 

Bryan,  James  Wallace 7, 45, 59 

Bryan,  Mary  Baird 7 

Bryan,  William  Jennings 7 

Buck's  stove  and  range  company, 

St.  Louis 5,7,8,10, 

47, 49,  51,  53,  54,  55, 56, 57, 58,  59 

Bullard,  Herbert  S 34 

Burdick,  Francis  M 51 

Burnett,  John 33 

Burns,  W.  F 8 

Caldwell,  Henry  Clay 58 

California.     University 11 

Carland,  John  E 9 

Carnegie,  Andrew 20 

Cases,  Tables  of 9, 14, 17, 30 

Chandler,  William  E 52 

Charnock,  Singleton 9 

Cheyney,  E.  P 33 

Chicago  railway  strike,  1894.  3,8, 30, 35,  60 
Citizen's     library    of     economics, 

politics,  and  sociology 11 

Clabaugh,  Harry  M 50 

Clark,  John  Bates 9 

Clark,  Lindley  D 44 

Clayton,  Henry  D 9 

Cogley ,  Thomas  Sydenham 9 

Cohen,  Arthur 12 

Cohen,  Hermann  Joseph 9 

Colby,  Frank  Moore 18 

Columbia  university 13 

Commons,  John  Rogers 10 

Compendium      of      transportation 

t  heories 60 

Conspiracy 4, 

7,  9,  10,  12,  13,  15,  16,  19,  24,  25, 
26,  27,  28,  20,  32,  33,  35,  46,  58,  61 
Constitutional   rights  of  working- 
men  4 

65 


66 


INDEX 


Page 
Constitutionality  of  use  of  injunc- 
tions in  labor  cases 35, 37,  58 

Contempts  of  court 3,  23, 

25,  26,  27,  29,  52, 53, 
54,57,60,61,62,63 

Cook,  E.Wake 53 

Cooke,  Frederick  Hale 10 

Corbin,  Arthur  Linton 19 

Courts: 

Attitude  toward  labor 12, 

14,  20,  23, 38,  50 

Decisions 10,  24,  30, 33, 

34,  39, 40, 45, 47,  49,  51,  56,  57,  60 

Courts  of  equity 17,  38 

Crosby,  Ernest  II 42 

Crosby,  Oscar  T 10 

Curtis,  Leonard  E 36 

Cyclopedia  of  law  and  procedme..  18, 19 
Danbury  hatters'  case: 

See  Loewe  vs.  Lawlor 

Darling,  Charles  R 43, 49 

Darlington,  Joseph  James 7,  8, 10 

Davenport,  Daniel 7, 10,  27, 42 

Dean,  Ben  S 38 

Debs,  Eugene  Victor 60 

Debs  case: 

See    Chicago    railway    strike, 
1894 

Democratic  party 51, 52,  62 

Devine,  Thomas  II 60 

Dickson,  Charles  A 34 

District  of  Columbia.     Court  of  ap- 
peals   8, 55, 56,  57,  63 

Supreme  court 8,  50,  53, 54 

Donnell,  F.  C 61 

Dorman,  Lester  M 33 

Drew,  Walter 56,  61 

Dunbar,  William  II 11 

Dunedin,  Andrew  Graham  Murray, 

1st  haron 12 

Dunne,  Edward  F 37 

Durand,  Edward  Dana 29,  30 

Dwight,  Frederick 51,  62 

Eaves,  Lucile 11 

Eddy,  Arthur  Jerome 11 

Edgerton,  Charles  E 30 

Edgerton,  John  Warren 18, 19 

Edwards,  Alba  M 11 

Edwards,  Clement 46 

Edwards,  Percy  L 38,  44 

EUsbree,  E.  C 17 

Elm,  Adolph  von 44 

Ely,  Richard  Theodore 11 


Page 

Emery,  James  A 3, 51,  57,  58 

Encyclopaedia    of    pleading    and 

practice 11, 18 

Erwin,  James  S 35 

Farmers'  loan  and  trust  company. .  28, 30 

Fauntleroy,  Cornelius  H 56 

Finch,  James  A 29 

Fisher,  S.  B 11,17 

Fleming,  W^illiam  Henry 28 

Florida.     Supreme  court 61 

Flower,  Benjamin  Orange 41 

Frazier,  Walter  S 59 

Freedom  of  speech: 

See  Libel  and  slander 
Freedom  of  the  press: 

See  Liberty  of  the  press 

Freund,  Ernst 45,  47 

Frey,  Erich  Max 12 

Furuseth,  Andrew 3,  43, 45,  63 

George,  Henry,  jr 12 

Georgia  bar  association 6, 31 

Ghent,  William  James 12 

Gompers,  Samuel 5,  7,  8, 

10, 12,  23,  26,  27,  37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 
42,  43,  44,  45,  46,  47,  48,  49,  50,  51, 
52,  53,  54, 55, 56,  57,  58,  59,  62,  63 

Gould,  Ashley  M 8, 48, 49,  63 

Grafton  and  Coos  bar  association..  6 

Grant,  Luke 47 

Great  Britain.     Laws,  statutes,  etc.         9, 

13, 17,  30 

Parliament 12 

Royal  commission  on  trade  dis- 
putes    12, 17 

Greenbaum,  Milton  D 61 

Gregory,  Charles  Noble 38 

Gregory,  Stephen  Strong 35 

Groat,  George  Gorham 13, 52 

Grosscup,  Peter  Stenger 37 

Guide  to  reading  in  social  ethics. . .         19 

Gunton,  George 34 

Hackney,  Thomas 13 

Haddow,  John 26 

Haldane,  R.  B 41 

Hale,  Richard  W 54 

Hallett,  Allen  P 13 

Hammond,  William  A 32 

Ilandworterbuch  der  Staatswissen- 

schaften 13 

Hargis,  Thomas  F 37 

Harvard  university 19 

Hatters'  case: 

See  Loewe  vs.  Lawlor 


INDEX 


67 


Page 

Heckel,  Max  von 13, 35 

Heidelberg.  Universitat 12 

Heise,  Stephan . ." 44 

Hendrick,  Burton  J 52 

Henry,  Robert  Lee 13 

Hewitt,  Edgar  Percy 15 

High,  James  Lambert 13 

High,  Shirley  T 13 

Hill,  David  Bennett 29 

History  of  boycotting  and  injunc- 
tions    11, 16, 32, 53,62 

Hitchman  coal  and  coke  company .  25, 26 

Hoar  anti-injunction  bill 24 

Holdom,  Jesse 45 

Hourwich,  Isaac  A 52 

Howell,  George 9, 13, 14 

Huebner,  Grover  Gerhard 14, 47 

Hughes,  William 14 

Hunt,  John 19 

Hunter,  Wiles  Robert 14 

Illinois  state  bar  association 15, 60 

Independent  labour  party 16 

Indiana.     State  bar  association: 

See  State  bar  association  of  In- 
diana 

Interference  with  employees 4 

Intimidation 30, 4 1 ,  60 

Iowa  state  bar  association 60 

Jenkins,  John  J 27 

Jevons,  Thomas  Seton 14 

Jewett,  John  N 15 

Joel,  J.  Edmondson 46 

Johns  Hopkins  university 13 

Joyce,  Howard  C 15 

Judson,  Frederick  Newton 15 

Jury  trial 10,  23, 35, 37,  58, 60 

Kennedy,  John  C 49 

Kentucky  bar  association 60 

Kernan,  John  D 30 

Kerr,  William  Williamson 15 

Kirby,  John,  jr 56 

Kleeberg,  August 43 

Knaus,  Henry 15 

Knowlton,  Jerome  C 62 

Labor  contract 29 

Labor  union  funds 12,  16 

Labor  unions  as  monopolies 61 

Lawlor  vs.  Loewe: 

See  Loewe  vs.  Lawlor 

Laws  and  legislation 6, 9, 

10,  11,  13,  15,  17,  18,  19, 

21,  22,  30,  31,  42,  47,  49 

California 1 1 


I'age 
Laws  and  legislation— Continued 

Canada 21 

Connecticut u 

Germany 47 

Great  Britain 7,9^ 

13,  14,  16,  17,  21,  25, 
30,  44,  45,  46,  48,  49 

MassachusetUs 17 

New  York 13 

United  States 22, 

24,29,30,33,44,46 

Lawyers'  reports  annotated 15 

Leavitt,  John  Brooks 16 

Leipart,  Theodor 50 

Lennon,  John  B 56 

Lewis,  Henry  Harrison 52 

Le^vis,  Llewelyn 22 

Lewis,  William  Draper 33,34,35,38 

Libel  and  slander 4, 10, 

33,54,55,56.58,63 
Liberty  of  speech: 

See  Libel  and  slander 

Liberty  of  the  press 4,  54,  55,  56, 63 

Liechti,  Eugen 16 

Lindsay,  Samuel  McCune 30 

Littlefield,  Charles  E 3, 16, 

26,28,47,50,51,60,62,63 

Livernash,  Edward  J 43 

Lloyd,  Henry  Demarest 16 

Lockouts 9, 12,  16, 37,  43,  53 

Loewe  vs.  Lawlor  (the  hatters'  case )       49, 
57,58,61,62 

Lorimer,  J .  C 36 

Low,  Alfred  Maurice 16,  25 

Low,  Seth 52, 61, 62, 63 

McCabe,  James 37 

MacDonald,  Edward  A 55 

Mac  Donald,  James  Ramsay 16 

Mack,  William 18.  19 

McKenzie,  IVter  H 18 

McKinney,  William  M 11 

McMurlrie,  Richard  C 33 

McWilliams,  Robert  1 47 

Mahou,  John 50 

Mails.Obstruction  of  United  States.     3,61 

Mandamus 21,  35 

Mantoux,  Paul 16 

Martin,  John 55 

Martin,  William  Alexander 17 

Maryland.     Univerxity  .  .  .  18 

Mason,  Jann's  M 32 

Mason,  Norman  T...  •<4 


68 


INDEX 


Page 
Massachusetts.     Bureau  of  statistics        17 

Bureau  of  statistics  of  labor 17 

Committee  on  relations  hetxveen 
employer  and  employee 60 

Supreme  judicial  court 4,  36 

Meier,  W.  F 61 

Merritt,  Walter  Gordon 18,  58 

Milburn,  B.  A 18 

Miller,  James  A 41 

Missouri.     Supreme  court 36 

Mitchell,  John 5,  7, 10, 

18,  25,  26,  51, 55, 56,  57,  61,  62,  63 

Morancy,  Frank  W 39 

Morrison,  Frank 5,  7, 

8, 10,  51,  55, 56,  57,  62, 63 

Moses,  Jacob  M 18 

Mothersole,  Hartley  B.N 12 

Murphy,  Walter 18 

National  civic  federation 58, 62, 63 

Neill,  CharlesP 3 

New  encyclopedia  of  social  reform .         16 
New  international  encyclopaedia  . .         14 

New  international  year  book 18 

Nicholls,  Thomas  David 18 

Noble,  Herbert 63 

Northern     Pacific     railroad    com- 
pany   25,  28,  30 

Oklahoma  bar  association 20 

Olmsted,  Victor  H 29 

Parker,  Alton  Brooks 5, 18, 53,  55 

Paterson,  John  Melvin 15 

Patteson,  Seargent  Smith  Prentice.        38 

Pearre  anti-injunction  bill 21, 46 

Pearson,  Paul  Martin 19 

Pennsylvania.     Supreme  court 4 

Peterkin,  William  G 38 

Peters,  John  P 16 

Philips,  John  F 35 

Picketing 9, 10, 12, 19,  29, 36,  39,  45 

Pingrey,  D.  H 34 

Portenar,  A.J 53 

Post,  Louis  F 41 

Press,  Liberty  of: 

See  Liberty  of  the  press 

Primm,  C.J 57 

Public  policy,  Chicago 19 

Pullman  strike,  1894: 

See  Chicago  strike,  1894 

Questions  of  the  day 10 

Ralston,  Jackson  H 3, 5, 19 

Ralston,  Siddons  &  Richardson  ...  5 

Ray,  Charles  A 19 


Page 

Ray,  George  Washington 27 

Reed,  Chester  A 35 

Republican  party 51, 52, 62 

Reynolds,  Stephen  Marion 60 

Richardson,  William  E 5 

Richmond,  Va.     Circuit  court 33 

Richmond,  Va.     Hustings  court...  32,33 

Ricks,  Augustus  J 24 

Ripley,  William  Z 10, 19 

Rogers,  Henry  Wade 19 

Rogers,  W.  P 20 

Rooker,  William  Velpau 43 

Roosevelt,  Theodore 20,  51, 52,  53 

Sartorius   von  Waltershausen,  Jo- 

hann  Georg  August,  freiherr 20,  32 

Schaffner,  Margaret  Anna 20,  55,  59 

Seabury,  Samuel 42 

Seager,  Henry  R 48 

Sedgwick,  Arthur  George 37 

Selections  and  documents  in  eco- 
nomics          10 

Selfridge,  Arthur  James 33 

Selover,  George  H 35 

Shartel,  John  W 20 

Shepard,  Almond  G 59,63 

Shepard,  Henry  M 37 

Sherman  antitrust  act,  1890. .  .   6,  22,  24, 
26,  29,  50,  52,  57,  60,  61,  62,  63 

Sherwood,  Isaac  R 20 

Siddons,  Frederick  L 5 

Silverstein,  David 50 

Simpson,  John 21 

Smeaton,  Oliphant 6 

Smith,  Charles  Manley 21 

Smith,  Ernest  Manley 21 

Smith,  Jeremiah 61 

Social  problems  series 6 

Social  reform  club 21,  25 

South  Dakota  bar  association 9 

Speech,  Freedom  of: 

See  Libel  and  slander 

Speer,  Emory 24 

Speer,"  WiUiam  H 50,  54 

Spelling,  Thomas  Carl 21,  27, 47, 61 

Stanton,  Stephen  B 35 

State  bar  association  of  Indiana 20 

Steffee,  John  G 42 

Stephen,  James  Fitzjames 32 

Stern,  Samuel  R 60 

Steuart,  William  M 29 

Stevens,  Frederick  W 53 

Stewart,  Ardemus 35 


INDEX 


69 


Page 
Stillman,  James  W 38 

Stimson,  Frederick  Jesup 22, 

25, 29, 30, 36, 38 

Stoll,  R.  C 60 

Stote,  Amos 55 

Strikes,  Sympathetic,  as  boycotts.         47 

Sullivan,  W.  C 10 

Sumner,  Helen  L 3 

Swan,  Charles  Herbert 22 

Swayne,  Wager 60 

Sweet,  Ada  C 63 

Taff-Vale  case 6, 16, 42 

Taft,  William  Howard 15, 

22, 23,  24, 48, 52, 56, 57,  59, 62 

Tandy,  Francis  D 39 

Taylor,  Graham 53 

Temple,  M.  L 60 

Tennessee  bar  association 31 

Terrester 59 

Territorial  bar  association  of  Utah. .         18 

Thacher,  Sherman  D 32 

Thomas,  David  Y 55 

Thomas,  Robert  Young,  jr 23 

Thompson,  Seymour  D 32, 38 

Tiedeman,  Christopher  Gustavus..        24 

Torrey,  James  H 44 

Trickett,  W 51 

Trieber,  Jacob 51, 62 

Tuley,  Murray  F 37 

Turner,  George  Kibbe ^ 53 

United  mine  workers  of  America. .  14, 50 

United  States.     Bureau  of  labor. . .       16, 

24,  25, 30 

Circuit  courts 24 

Congress 12, 

21,24,25,26,27,28,29,30 

Courts 29 

Industrial  commission 29, 30 


Page 
United  States— Continued. 

Laws,  statutes,  etc 24, 30 

President  (Roosevelt) 20 

Strike  commission,  1894 30 

Supreme  court 3,  8,  49 

Upson,  William  H 36 

Utah.    Territorial  bar  association: 
See  Territorial  bar  association 
of  Utah 

Van  Cleave,  James  W 48 

Veeder,  Van  Vechten 56 

Voorhees,  Daniel  W 30 

Walker,  Aldace  F 34 

Walker,  John  T 5 

Waring,  Luther  Hess 31 

Washington  state  bar  association ...  60 

Watson,  Samuel 31 

Webb,  Sidney 12 

Weber,  William  H 26 

Wellford,  B.  R.,  ;V 33 

West  Virginia  bar  association 38 

White,  Henry 41,52 

Wigmore,  John  H 33 

Williams,  Sydney  E 15 

Willingham,  Wright 31 

Willison,  Eugene 29 

Wilson,  W.  B 40 

Wisconsin.     Free    library    commis- 
sion    14 

University 14 

Wissell,  Rudolf 53 

Woollen,  Evans 36 

Worthington,  Nicholas  E 30 

Wright,  Carroll  D 30 

Wright,  Daniel  Thew 53,54,58 

Wyman,  Bruce 42 

Yarros,  Victor 36, 38 

Zurich.     Universitat 16 


o 


SOUTHERN  BRANCH, 

UNIVEHSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA, 

LIBRARY, 

1LX)S  ANGELES.  CALIF. 


^ 
a 


■' ^  55 

^"•"^  so 


.a«^AA» 


lOJ.^jnii  JO*- 


MYO/:. 


AS      ^ 


% 


L  005  485  916  0 


■■'OUJ/MI'll  Jl> 


irs  H;! 


^         £ 


UC  SOUTHERN  RFGIONAL  JBRi^Y  FACiL'TY 


III  II    III 

AA    001  166  398    6 


> 
3 


3  -r 


^ 

o 


7)J0=^'       ^ 


^  21 


5.             -5 

^          ^ 

^ 

IVFR% 

s 

E                      1  3 

?       i 

1          s 

<ri133NVS01^ 

1                t 

a:: 
=> 

it: 


^v 


•tJ'/ 


•^ 


tj 
5 

g 
■/ 


6: 


!  ^ 


-'(/AiJViliilli^^' 


'")- 


